Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-313 (2026)
When possession by or delivery to secured party perfects security interest without filing
✓ current as of July 2026
- (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b), a secured party may perfect a security interest in tangible negotiable documents, goods, instruments, money, or tangible chattel paper by taking possession of the collateral. A secured party may perfect a security interest in certificated securities by taking delivery of the certificated securities under Section 75-8-301.
- (b) With respect to goods covered by a certificate of title issued by this state, a secured party may perfect a security interest in the goods by taking possession of the goods only in the circumstances described in Section 75-9-316(d).
- (c) With respect to collateral other than certificated securities and goods covered by a document, a secured party takes possession of collateral in the possession of a person other than the debtor, the secured party, or a lessee of the collateral from the debtor in the ordinary course of the debtor's business, when:
- (1) The person in possession authenticates a record acknowledging that it holds possession of the collateral for the secured party's benefit; or
- (2) The person takes possession of the collateral after having authenticated a record acknowledging that it will hold possession of collateral for the secured party's benefit.
- (d) If perfection of a security interest depends upon possession of the collateral by a secured party, perfection occurs no earlier than the time the secured party takes possession and continues only while the secured party retains possession.
- (e) A security interest in a certificated security in registered form is perfected by delivery when delivery of the certificated security occurs under Section 75-8-301 and remains perfected by delivery until the debtor obtains possession of the security certificate.
- (f) A person in possession of collateral is not required to acknowledge that it holds possession for a secured party's benefit.
- (g) If a person acknowledges that it holds possession for the secured party's benefit:
- (1) The acknowledgment is effective under subsection (c) or Section 75-8-301(a), even if the acknowledgment violates the rights of a debtor; and
- (2) Unless the person otherwise agrees or law other than this article otherwise provides, the person does not owe any duty to the secured party and is not required to confirm the acknowledgment to another person.
- (h) A secured party having possession of collateral does not relinquish possession by delivering the collateral to a person other than the debtor or a lessee of the collateral from the debtor in the ordinary course of the debtor's business if the person was instructed before the delivery or is instructed contemporaneously with the delivery:
- (1) To hold possession of the collateral for the secured party's benefit; or
- (2) A secured party does not relinquish possession, even if a delivery under subsection (h) violates the rights of a debtor. A person to which collateral is delivered under subsection (h) does not owe any duty to the secured party and is not required to confirm the delivery to another person unless the person otherwise agrees or law other than this article otherwise provides.
Former 1972 Code § 75-9-313 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:9-313; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 9-313; Laws, 1968, ch. 488, § 1; Laws, 1977, ch. 452, § 22; Laws, 1992, ch. 303, § 1; is now found in comparable provisions enacted at §§ 75-9-334 and 75-9-604 by Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1. Present § 75-9-313 was derived from former 1972 Code §§ 75-9-115 [Laws, 1996, ch. 468, § 59, and 75-9-305 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:9-305; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 9-305; Laws, 1977, ch. 452, § 17; Laws, 1990, ch. 384, § 52, 1996, ch. 460, § 26; Laws, 1996, ch. 468, § 66, and was enacted by Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 527, § 66, eff. 7/1/2006.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: Edwards Fam. P'ship v. Johnson, 32 F.4th 472 (5th Cir. 2022).
Edwards Fam. P'ship v. Johnson, 32 F.4th 472 (5th Cir. 2022). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-313 (c)(2). Here, it is undisputed that Rainbow Group held a perfected security interest in the HIL loans, pursuant to this statutory provision, based on the Custodial Agreement and Rainbow Loan Agreement between the McCarley Firm, Rainbow Group, and…”
Motorola Commc'ns & Elec., Inc. v. Clarence N. Dale, Jr. & Barbara Camin Dale, 665 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1982). “See Miss. Code Ann. §§ 75-9-313 (l)(b); 75-9-313(4)(b); 75-9-402(5) (1980 Supp.”
Deborah West v. Charles Timothy West, West Quality Food Servs., Inc., & Coastal Express, Inc. (Miss. 2023). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-313 (a) (Rev. 2016).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.