Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter:

Codes, 1942, § 7716-01; Laws, 1956, ch. 372, § 1; Laws, 1968, ch. 502, § 1; Laws, 1983, ch. 467, § 4; Laws, 1988, ch. 310, § 1; Laws, 1990, ch. 530, § 41; Laws, 1993, ch. 304, § 1; Laws, 2002, ch. 513, § 2; Laws, 2005, ch. 305, § 1; Laws, 2012, ch. 447, § 1, eff. 7/1/2012.

Brought forward by Laws, 2024, ch. 369, HB 1583,§ 5, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 352, HB 1060,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 322, SB 2433,§ 2, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 477, SB 2798,§ 2, eff. 4/22/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 368, HB 297,§ 1, eff. 3/16/2018.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1979–2018 · leading case: Gannett Co. v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 940 So. 2d 221 (Miss. 2006).
Gannett Co. v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 940 So. 2d 221 (Miss. 2006). · cites it 3× “Entergy contends that the chancellor's ruling should be upheld, arguing in part that the fee it charges Nissan under a special contract is not a "rate" under Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (e), [13] which is generally subject to public disclosure.”
Mississippi Rural Water Ass'n, Inc v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 222 So. 3d 288 (Miss. 2017). · cites it 4× “] Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (e) (emphasis added).”
State Ex Rel. Pittman v. Pub. Serv. Com'n, 538 So. 2d 367 (Miss. 1989). · cites it 2× “Finally, the appellees note that in 1988 the legislature amended the definition of "rate" found in Miss. Code Ann., § 77-3-3(e) (Supp. 1988), to include as a rate "the formula or method by which such may be determined.”
Ware v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 887 So. 2d 763 (Miss. 2003). “There are other circumstances where the value to the property owners of having the electric distribution and service facilities installed underground will outweigh the added costs and other possible disadvantages of such installation.”
The Door Shop, Inc. v. Alcorn Cnty. Elec. Power Ass'n, 261 So. 3d 1099 (Miss. 2018). · cites it 2× “] Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (e) (Rev. 2018) (emphasis added).”
Sweet Home Water v. Lexington Estates, Ltd., 613 So. 2d 864 (Miss. 1993). “FACTS The Sweet Home Water and Sewer District (the District) is a public utility created under Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (d)(iv) and with such powers delegated to it by the Legislature.”
Singing River Mall Co. v. Mark Fields, Inc., 599 So. 2d 938 (Miss. 1992). “Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (Supp. 1988). The statute prohibits any person from distributing electricity without having obtained a certificate of public convenience or necessity.”
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Purcell Co., Inc., 606 So. 2d 93 (Miss. 1990). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (d)(iii). Therefore, our inquiry into conditions precedent required by our law before the power of eminent domain may be properly invoked and exercised must continue.”
Miss. State Tax Com'n v. Moselle Fuel Co., 568 So. 2d 720 (Miss. 1990). “Under the laws of this State, Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (Supp. 1989), a public utility includes a pipeline which sells gas to the public for compensation.”
City of Tchula v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 187 So. 3d 597 (Miss. 2016). “” See Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-3(d). Also, Section 77-3-6 provides for Commission review of billing disputes between a “municipally-owned or operated public utility” and its customers.”
Bellsouth Telecomm., Inc. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 So. 3d 199 (Miss. 2009). “Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-3(e)(Rev.2000). ¶ 27.”
Motorola Commc'ns & Elec., Inc. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 515 F. Supp. 793 (S.D. Miss. 1979). · cites it 3× “This Court, having considered the arguments of the parties, views the Mississippi Public Service Commission’s applica *796 tion of Miss.Code § 77-3-3 (1972) to plaintiff Motorola as an illegal attempt to usurp jurisdiction to regulate communication activity that is preempted by…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3(d) — 1 case
City of Tchula v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 187 So. 3d 597 (Miss. 2016). “” See Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-3(d). Also, Section 77-3-6 provides for Commission review of billing disputes between a “municipally-owned or operated public utility” and its customers.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3(e) — 4 cases
State Ex Rel. Pittman v. Pub. Serv. Com'n, 538 So. 2d 367 (Miss. 1989). “Finally, the appellees note that in 1988 the legislature amended the definition of "rate" found in Miss. Code Ann., § 77-3-3(e) (Supp. 1988), to include as a rate "the formula or method by which such may be determined.”
Ware v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 887 So. 2d 763 (Miss. 2003). “There are other circumstances where the value to the property owners of having the electric distribution and service facilities installed underground will outweigh the added costs and other possible disadvantages of such installation.”
Gannett Co. v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 940 So. 2d 221 (Miss. 2006). “Entergy contends that the chancellor's ruling should be upheld, arguing in part that the fee it charges Nissan under a special contract is not a "rate" under Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-3 (e), [13] which is generally subject to public disclosure.”
Bellsouth Telecomm., Inc. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 So. 3d 199 (Miss. 2009). “Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-3(e)(Rev.2000). ¶ 27.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.