Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-35 (2026)

Regulation of rates and charges generally; approval of certain contracts of utilities; regulation of provision of telecommunication services; adoption of alternative methods of regulation; Public Service Commission authorized to regulate only rates, terms and conditions of certain switched access services and single-line flat rate voice communication services; incumbent local exchange carrier to provide primary single-line flat rate voice communication service to premises of permanent residence or business within its franchised service territory if cost to requesting party does not exceed certain amount; commission to retain exclusive original jurisdiction over customer complaints for services continuing to be regulated; certain telecommunication utilities required only to file financial or service quality information required to be filed with Federal Communications Commission

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 7716-09; Laws, 1956, ch. 372, § 9; Laws, 1988, ch. 338; Laws, 1994, ch. 315, § 1; Laws, 1995, ch. 348, § 1; Laws, 1996, ch. 304, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 313, § 1; Laws, 2012, ch. 447, § 2, eff. 7/1/2012.

Amended by Laws, 2024EX2, ch. 3, SB 2001,§ 28, eff. 1/30/2024.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–2009 · leading case: Ware v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 887 So. 2d 763 (Miss. 2003).
Ware v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 887 So. 2d 763 (Miss. 2003). “Entergy asserts that, under Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-35 and the Policy For The Extension of Underground Electric Distribution Facilities filed with the Public Service Commission (PSC), Entergy is not entitled to or authorized to place a power line underground unless the customer…”
Bellsouth Telecomm., Inc. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 So. 3d 199 (Miss. 2009). “Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-35 (Supp.2008)(emphasis added.”
Crosby v. City of Jackson, 813 F. Supp. 476 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-35. [N]o public utility shall make any change in any rate which has been duly established under this chapter except as provided in this chapter.”
John H. Ware v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (Miss. 2002). “Entergy asserts that, under Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-35 and the Policy For The Extension of Underground Electric Distribution Facilities filed with the Public Service Commission (PSC), Entergy is not entitled to or authorized to place a power line underground unless the customer…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.