Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37 (2026)

Changes in rates

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 7716-10; Laws, 1956, ch. 372, § 10; Laws, 1983, ch. 467, § 15; Laws, 1985, ch. 302, § 1; Laws, 1988, ch. 310, § 2; Laws, 1990, ch. 530, § 39; Laws, 1992, ch. 417, § 4; Laws, 1997, ch. 540, § 1, eff. 7/1/1997.

Amended by Laws, 2024EX2, ch. 3, SB 2001,§ 29, eff. 1/30/2024.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Mississippi Power Co. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 168 So. 3d 905 (Miss. 2015).
Mississippi Power Co. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 168 So. 3d 905 (Miss. 2015). · cites it 3× “” Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-37(1) (Rev.2009). The Commission improperly determined rate-impact information to be confidential, concealing from the ratepayers the amount of the projected increases.”
Mississippi Power Co. v. Goudy, 459 So. 2d 257 (Miss. 1984). “Sections 15-16, Chapter 467, Laws 1983, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 77-3-37 , 77-3-39 (1983 Supp.”
Gannett Co. v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 940 So. 2d 221 (Miss. 2006). “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 77-3-37 & -39. [2] Rule 4D of the MPSC's Public Utilities Rules of Practice and Procedure states, in part: [a]ny document filed with the Commission and alleged to contain trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information subject to the…”
North Mississippi Util. Co. v. Wentworth, 604 So. 2d 218 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 6× “It concluded that Miss.Code Ann. §§ 77-3-37, -39, -47 were unconstitutional for want of procedural due process and the causes should be reversed and remanded for proper notice and disposition.”
Se. Miss. Legal Serv. Corp. v. Miss. Power Co., 605 So. 2d 796 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-39 (1) (1972) in relevant part requires a full hearing in the case of changes in rates constituting "a major change.”
State Ex Rel. Pittman v. Pub. Serv. Com'n, 538 So. 2d 367 (Miss. 1989). “" Miss. Code Ann., § 77-3-37(10), in turn provides: "Major changes" means (a) an increase in rates which would increase the annual revenues of such public utility more than the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.”
State Ex Rel. Pittman v. MISSISSIPPI PSC, 506 So. 2d 978 (Miss. 1987). “We hold that these parties should be joined in the prudency review to be accomplished on remand of this case, in order to accomplish a complete review of the transactions between MP & L, MSEI, and MSU, and their effect on Grand Gulf expense. III.”
Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Dixie Land & Water Co., 707 So. 2d 1086 (Miss. 1998). “e twelvemonth period beginning with the effective date of the changed rates (i) without giving effect to the changed rates and (ii) giving effect to the changed rates; (f) A pro forma operating statement in the same form as the actual operating statement for the same period…”
Crosby v. City of Jackson, 813 F. Supp. 476 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “Public utilities seeking a change in any rate or rates filed shall file with the secretary of the commission and the executive director of the Public Utilities staff the notice of intent to change rates.”
Mississippi Power Co., Inc. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n (Miss. 2015). · cites it 2× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37 (1). 13 MPC’s service area.”
Rankin Cnty., Mississippi v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n & Entergy Mississippi, LLC (Miss. 2024). “1 Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37 (1) (Rev. 2018).”
Gannett River States Publ'g Co., Inc. v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (Miss. 2004). “Miss. Code Ann. §§ 77-3-37 & -39. 2 notified Entergy of Gannett’s request and informed Entergy that it would release the information in thirty days unless Entergy obtained an injunction blocking such disclosure.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37(1) — 2 cases
Mississippi Power Co. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 168 So. 3d 905 (Miss. 2015). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-37(1) (Rev.2009). The Commission improperly determined rate-impact information to be confidential, concealing from the ratepayers the amount of the projected increases.”
Crosby v. City of Jackson, 813 F. Supp. 476 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “Public utilities seeking a change in any rate or rates filed shall file with the secretary of the commission and the executive director of the Public Utilities staff the notice of intent to change rates.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37(10) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Pittman v. Pub. Serv. Com'n, 538 So. 2d 367 (Miss. 1989). “" Miss. Code Ann., § 77-3-37(10), in turn provides: "Major changes" means (a) an increase in rates which would increase the annual revenues of such public utility more than the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37(2)(e) — 1 case
Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Dixie Land & Water Co., 707 So. 2d 1086 (Miss. 1998). “e twelvemonth period beginning with the effective date of the changed rates (i) without giving effect to the changed rates and (ii) giving effect to the changed rates; (f) A pro forma operating statement in the same form as the actual operating statement for the same period…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37(6) — 1 case
North Mississippi Util. Co. v. Wentworth, 604 So. 2d 218 (Miss. 1992). “It concluded that Miss.Code Ann. §§ 77-3-37, -39, -47 were unconstitutional for want of procedural due process and the causes should be reversed and remanded for proper notice and disposition.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37(7) — 1 case
North Mississippi Util. Co. v. Wentworth, 604 So. 2d 218 (Miss. 1992). “It concluded that Miss.Code Ann. §§ 77-3-37, -39, -47 were unconstitutional for want of procedural due process and the causes should be reversed and remanded for proper notice and disposition.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37(8) — 1 case
North Mississippi Util. Co. v. Wentworth, 604 So. 2d 218 (Miss. 1992). “It concluded that Miss.Code Ann. §§ 77-3-37, -39, -47 were unconstitutional for want of procedural due process and the causes should be reversed and remanded for proper notice and disposition.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-37(9) — 1 case
Mississippi Power Co. v. Mississippi Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 168 So. 3d 905 (Miss. 2015). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 77-3-37(1) (Rev.2009). The Commission improperly determined rate-impact information to be confidential, concealing from the ratepayers the amount of the projected increases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.