Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (2026)

Property exempt from seizure under execution or attachment

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

There shall be exempt from seizure under execution or attachment:

Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 62, art. 1 (23); 1857, ch. 61, art. 280; 1871, § 2131; 1880, § 1244; 1892, § 1963; 1906, § 2139; Hemingway's 1917, § 1812; 1930, § 1755; 1942, § 307; Laws, 1932, ch. 138; Laws, 1948, ch. 232, § 1; Laws, 1962, 1st Ex Sess. ch. 7; Laws, 1966, ch. 318, § 1; Laws, 1980, ch. 540, § 1; Laws, 1981, ch. 469, § 3; Laws, 1987, ch. 473; Laws, 1991, ch. 479, § 7; Laws, 1995, ch. 565, § 1; Laws, 2002, ch. 594, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 595, § 1; Laws, 2008, ch. 557, § 1, eff. 7/1/2008.

Amended by Laws, 2020, ch. 326, HB 1071,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2020.

Amended by Laws, 2015, ch. 457, HB 1134, 6, eff. 1/1/2015.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 53 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Deposit Guar. Nat'l Bank v. McLeod (In Re McLeod), 102 B.R. 60 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 1989).
Deposit Guar. Nat'l Bank v. McLeod (In Re McLeod), 102 B.R. 60 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 1989). · cites it 8× “During November of 1988, the debtor filed motions for partial summary judgment in which he claimed that as a matter of law he was entitled to certain exemptions provided by Section 85-3-1 of the Mississippi Code. The debtor claimed as exempt in his bankruptcy schedules, as…”
Cartwright v. Deposit Guar. Nat. Bank, 675 So. 2d 847 (Miss. 1996). · cites it 12× “Cartwright, a judgment debtor of Deposit Guaranty, attempted to claim the account and the funds it represented as exempt property pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (1972). The county court found that the account was not exempt, since it was not "tangible personal property"…”
Hemsley v. Hemsley, 639 So. 2d 909 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (1991). Assets that the legislature has seen fit to protect from creditors this Court now finds subject to division between divorcing spouses.”
Barkley v. Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc. (In Re Kennedy), 139 B.R. 389 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1992). · cites it 11× “Section 85-3-1, MCA, provides as follows: There shall be exempt from seizure under execution or attachment: (a) Tangible personal property of any kind, not exceeding Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.”
Parker v. Parker, 641 So. 2d 1133 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (1991). Ironically, what the legislature has seen fit to protect from creditors, this Court now decrees subject to division between divorcing spouses.”
Brame v. Brame, 796 So. 2d 970 (Miss. 2001). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (2000). Sherrye's interest in the trust consists of a one-third remainder interest in the $600,000 corpus.”
Bonds v. Bonds, 409 So. 2d 704 (Miss. 1982). · cites it 4× “818 (1927), even this liberal interpretation must yield when the subject of the garnishment is for child support and alimony which have been specifically excluded from the general exemption statute, the only statute that could apply in this case, which is Section 85-3-1 and…”
Maranatha Faith Ctr., Inc. v. Colonial Trust Co., 904 So. 2d 1004 (Miss. 2004). · cites it 2× “Relying on Miss.Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (Supp.2004), Maranatha claims that the writ should have been quashed.”
Roup v. Com. Rsch., LLC, 2015 CO 38 (Colo. 2015). “98 (2014); Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (g) (2014); Neb.”
One Source Forms & Labels, Inc. v. Callahan (In re Davidson), 596 B.R. 841 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2019). · cites it 2× “00 from his wildcard exemption provided under Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (h). Undoubtedly, this is a disappointing result considering the enormity of what he has lost due to Callahan's actions.”
In Re Cobbins, 234 B.R. 882 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 1999). · cites it 6× “Miss.Code Ann. § 85-3-1. Thus, as a result of the 1995 amendment limiting the range of personal property that may be exempted from seizure, a debtor is also prohibited from claiming a mobile home as exempt personal property.”
Denise E. Mooney v. Joy R. Webster, 812 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2016). “22(2); Miss.Code Ann. § 85-3-1(g); Or.Rev.Stat. § 18.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(1) — 2 cases
Barkley v. Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc. (In Re Kennedy), 139 B.R. 389 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1992). “Section 85-3-1, MCA, provides as follows: There shall be exempt from seizure under execution or attachment: (a) Tangible personal property of any kind, not exceeding Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.”
ITT Fin. Servs. v. Fox (In re Fox), 902 F.2d 411 (5th Cir. 1990).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(1)(a) — 1 case
Haynes v. First United Bank of Mississippi (In re Haynes), 95 B.R. 44 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1988).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(1)(d) — 1 case
Barkley v. Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc. (In Re Kennedy), 139 B.R. 389 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1992). “Section 85-3-1, MCA, provides as follows: There shall be exempt from seizure under execution or attachment: (a) Tangible personal property of any kind, not exceeding Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(2) — 1 case
ITT Fin. Servs. v. Fox (In re Fox), 902 F.2d 411 (5th Cir. 1990).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(a) — 5 cases
Lawrence v. Greenline Equip., Inc., 676 So. 2d 291 (Miss. 1996).
Dennis Wester & Brenda Wester (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2020).
Nicole A. Cole (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2025).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(a)(iii) — 1 case
Nicole A. Cole (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2025).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(a)(iv) — 1 case
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(a)(vi) — 1 case
John E. Farris & Jaime L. Farris (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2022).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(d) — 1 case
Barkley v. Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc. (In Re Kennedy), 139 B.R. 389 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1992). “Section 85-3-1, MCA, provides as follows: There shall be exempt from seizure under execution or attachment: (a) Tangible personal property of any kind, not exceeding Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(e)(i) — 1 case
Gladwell v. Reinhart, 267 P.3d 895 (Utah 2011).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(g) — 1 case
Denise E. Mooney v. Joy R. Webster, 812 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2016). “22(2); Miss.Code Ann. § 85-3-1(g); Or.Rev.Stat. § 18.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1(h) — 1 case
Mills v. Billings (S.D. Miss. 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.