Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 93-13-211 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of July 2026
Codes, 1880, § 2073; 1892, § 1958; 1906, § 2132; Hemingway's 1917, § 1800; 1930, § 1911; 1942, § 448; Laws, 1918, ch. 126; Laws, 1938, ch. 272; Laws, 1944, ch. 308, § 1; Laws, 1956, ch. 211; Laws, 1962, ch. 275; Laws, 1964, ch. 292; Laws, 1972, ch. 408, § 19; Laws, 1986, ch. 387; Laws, 2010, ch. 552, § 1, eff. 7/1/2010.
Repealed by Laws, 2019, ch. 463, SB 2828,§ 17, eff. 1/1/2020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1988–2001 · leading case: Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. Moyo, 525 So. 2d 1289 (Miss. 1988).
Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. Moyo, 525 So. 2d 1289 (Miss. 1988). “McLaurin alleged she was the natural mother of Anthony, that he was a resident of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, and the court had jurisdiction of the case pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 93-13-211 , and "all necessary interested parties are joined herein.”
Hemphill-Weathers v. Farrish, 779 So. 2d 167 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. § 93-13-211 (Rev.1994). The chancellor approved Lavoris’s settlement of less than $10,000 without a guardianship first being established.”
Turner v. Ford Motor Co., 116 F. Supp. 2d 755 (S.D. Miss. 2000). “See also Miss.Code Ann. § 93-13-211 (1972) (providing that the chancery court must fully investigate and satisfy itself by evidence “that the proposed sum of money to be paid, either as liquidated or unliquidated damages because of any claim of said ward .”
Mississippi State Bar v. Attorney Y., 585 So. 2d 768 (Miss. 1991). “Miss.Code Ann. § 93-13-211 (Supp.1990). Because the sum due Y’s minor client exceeded $10,000, the only person authorized to receive it was a legal guardian duly appointed by a chancery court which had jurisdiction of him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.