Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (2026)

Accessories after the fact; punishment

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 64, art. 12, Title 8 (7); 1857, ch. 64, art. 3; 1871, § 2485; 1880, § 2699; 1892, § 951; 1906, § 1027; Hemingway's 1917, § 752; 1930, § 770; 1942, § 1996; Laws, 2012, ch. 496, § 1, eff. 4/30/2012.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 61 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Hye v. State, 162 So. 3d 750 (Miss. 2015).
Hye v. State, 162 So. 3d 750 (Miss. 2015). · cites it 8× “No evidence was presented to Hye’s jury that would have allowed it to consider whether Hye was guilty as an accessory after the fact, as prescribed by Mississippi Code Section 97-1-5(1) (Rev.2014). 2 ¶ 6. Hye’s requested instruction in this instance is known as a…”
Brazzle v. State, 13 So. 3d 810 (Miss. 2009). · cites it 12× “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (Rev. 2006); Gangl, 539 So.”
Joseph Ronald Hartfield v. State of Mississippi, 161 So. 3d 125 (Miss. 2015). · cites it 8× “Miss. Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (Rev. 2014). Because Graham asserted that she had assisted Dixon with covering up the crime and disposing of the body after he had murdered Tabitha, Graham confessed to some elements of the crime of acting as an accessory after the fact.”
Byrom v. State, 863 So. 2d 836 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (Rev.2000); Buckley v.”
Sherron v. State, 959 So. 2d 30 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 8× “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (Rev.2006). The manner in which Charlotte Sherron was said to have violated this statute was set out in the indictment: Charlotte Sherron .”
White v. State, 851 So. 2d 400 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 5× “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (Rev.2000). An effort that results in no assistance or aid to an absconding felon, even if undertaken with the requisite intent, simply does not accomplish the intended crime.”
Dampier v. State, 973 So. 2d 221 (Miss. 2008). · cites it 2× “2d at 874 -75 (citing Miss. Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (Rev.2006)). To find Dampier guilty of capital murder, the jury did not need to find he was the shooter.”
Parks v. State, 884 So. 2d 738 (Miss. 2004). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (Rev.2000), Every person who shall be convicted of having concealed, received, or relieved any felon, or having aided or assisted any felon, knowing that such person had committed a felony, with intent to enable such felon to escape or to…”
Buckley v. State, 511 So. 2d 1354 (Miss. 1987). · cites it 4× “Miss. Code Ann. §§ 97-1-5 and 97-17-33 (1972).”
Mangum v. State, 762 So. 2d 337 (Miss. 2000). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (1999). "One cannot be both a principal in the crime and an accessory after the fact.”
Dobbs v. State, 726 So. 2d 1267 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “" Miss.Code Ann. § 97-1-5 (Rev.1994). Thus, the adjudication of Robinson as a delinquent child who committed a delinquent act is of little consequence to Dobbs's case.”
Young v. State, 797 So. 2d 239 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “§ § 97-1-5, 97-1-7 (Rev.2000). The facts that substantiate the crimes of attempted robbery and accessory after the fact to armed robbery are substantially related to those which form the basis for the two counts of armed robbery charged in the indictment.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-1-5(1) — 4 cases
Hye v. State, 162 So. 3d 750 (Miss. 2015). “No evidence was presented to Hye’s jury that would have allowed it to consider whether Hye was guilty as an accessory after the fact, as prescribed by Mississippi Code Section 97-1-5(1) (Rev.2014). 2 ¶ 6. Hye’s requested instruction in this instance is known as a…”
Hye v. State, 162 So. 3d 818 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013).
Leagea v. State, 138 So. 3d 184 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-1-5(2) — 1 case
Taylor v. State, 122 So. 3d 707 (Miss. 2013).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.