Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (2026)

Penalty for forgery

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 64, art. 12, Title 4(42); 1857, ch. 64, art. 124; 1871, § 2588; 1880, § 2840; 1892, § 1119; 1906, § 1200; Hemingway's 1917, § 930; 1930, § 957; 1942, § 2187; Laws, 1928, ch. 38; Laws, 1970, ch. 343, § 1; Laws, 2003, ch. 499, § 6, eff. 7/1/2003.

Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 388, SB 2470,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 457, HB 585, 25, eff. 7/1/2014.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1986–2010 · leading case: Burt v. State, 493 So. 2d 1325 (Miss. 1986).
Burt v. State, 493 So. 2d 1325 (Miss. 1986). · cites it 2× “1985), and, if so, did it constitute cruel and unusual punishment? We now hold that the sentence was proper and in accordance with the appropriate statute. The defendant in the present case was indicted as a recidivist.”
Barnwell v. State, 567 So. 2d 215 (Miss. 1990). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (1972), provides that the penalty for forgery is a term of not less than two years, nor more than fifteen years.”
City of Jackson v. Brister, 838 So. 2d 274 (Miss. 2003). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (Rev. 2000) designates the penalty for a forgery: *282 Persons convicted of forgery shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of not less than two (2) years nor more than fifteen (15) years, provided, however, that when the amount…”
Steed v. State, 752 So. 2d 1056 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 3× “It must further be noted that no prejudice can be found in the actual sentence imposed in this matter since it was within the statutory sentencing guidelines and was within statutory guidelines imposed by Miss.Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (Rev.1994). So long as the sentence imposed is…”
Davis v. State, 758 So. 2d 463 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 3× “However, Miss.Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (Rev.1994) grants the trial judge discretion in sentencing individuals.”
Jefferson v. State, 958 So. 2d 1276 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (Rev.2003). During the 2003 legislative session, the Mississippi legislature reduced the maximum sentence from fifteen years to ten years.”
Alexander v. State, 879 So. 2d 512 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (Rev.2000). Because Alexander was not subjected to an undue burden or prejudice but to a significantly lesser sentence, the error by the trial court was harmless.”
Page v. State, 812 So. 2d 1039 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (Rev.2000). ¶ 12.”
Middleton v. State, 49 So. 3d 161 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (Rev.2006). Middleton should have received a ten-year sentence without eligibility for parole or probation.”
Tate v. State, 961 So. 2d 763 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (emphasis added).”
Bowen v. State, 995 So. 2d 844 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008). “00) in lieu of the punishment above provided for, the person convicted may be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a term of not more than six (6) months, or by a fine of not more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.”
Kemp v. State, 904 So. 2d 1162 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-21-33 (Rev.2000) (amended 2003).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.