Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 97-23-25 (2026)
Embezzlement; property held in trust or received on contract
✓ current as of July 2026
If any person shall fraudulently appropriate personal property or money which has been delivered to him on deposit, or to be carried or repaired, or on any other contract or trust by which he was bound to deliver or return the thing received or its proceeds, on conviction, he shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary not more than ten years, or be fined not more than one thousand dollars and imprisoned in the county jail not more than one year, or either.
Codes, 1880, § 2785; 1892, § 1061; 1906, § 1139; Hemingway's 1917, § 867; 1930, § 892; 1942, § 2118.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1976–2008 · leading case: Bell v. State, 910 So. 2d 640 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
Bell v. State, 910 So. 2d 640 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). “Bell was later charged with embezzlement under Mississippi Code Annotated § 97-23-25 (Rev.2000), and convicted by a jury.”
Salts v. State, 984 So. 2d 1050 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-23-25 (Rev.2000). The statute does not specify who the victim of an embezzlement is.”
Cmty. Bank, Ellisville, Ms v. Courtney, 884 So. 2d 767 (Miss. 2004). “The other statute, § 97-23-25, concerns embezzlement carries a penalty of "imprisonment in the penitentiary not more than ten years, or be fined not more than one thousand dollars and imprisoned in the county jail not more than one year, or either.”
Reid v. Mississippi State Bar, 586 So. 2d 786 (Miss. 1991). “Miss. Code Ann. § 97-23-25 (1972). It is the capital crime of a lawyer to his profession.”
Shelley v. State, 447 So. 2d 124 (Miss. 1984). “The embezzlement statute under which appellant was indicted is Mississippi Code Annotated, Section 97-23-25 (1972), which reads as follows: If any person shall fraudulently appropriate personal property or money which has been delivered to him on deposit, or to be carried or…”
Gulley v. State, 870 So. 2d 652 (Miss. 2004). “2000), which states: If any person shall fraudulently appropriate personal property or money which has been delivered to him on deposit, or to be carried or repaired, or on any other contract or trust by which he was bound to deliver or return the thing received or its proceeds,…”
Bass v. State, 328 So. 2d 665 (Miss. 1976). “Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-23-25 (1972), provides: "If any person shall fraudulently appropriate personal property or money which has been delivered to him on deposit, or to be carried or repaired, or on any other contract or trust by which he was bound to deliver or…”
Ruffin v. State, 482 So. 2d 231 (Miss. 1986). “Ruffin was indicted under Miss.Code Ann. § 97-23-25, which provides: If any person shall fraudulently appropriate personal property or money which has been delivered to him on deposit, or to be carried or repaired, or on any other contract or trust by which he was bound to…”
Crump v. State, 962 So. 2d 154 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-23-25 (Rev.2006). The statute itself is silent as to whether the intent to "fraudulently appropriate" the property must be formed at the time of the signing of the contract or whether it can be formed at some later date.”
McBride v. State, 366 So. 2d 666 (Miss. 1979). “inartfully drawn, it adequately stated a cause of action of embezzlement under Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-23-25 (1972). The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.”
Charles Douglas Gulley, Jr. v. State of Mississippi (Miss. 2002). “This Court determined that there were two alternative sentencing methods under Miss. Code Ann. § 97-23-25 (Rev. 2000), which states: If any person shall fraudulently appropriate personal property or money which has been delivered to him on deposit, or to be carried or repaired,…”
Cmty. Bank, Ellisville, Mississippi v. Archie Wayne Courtney (Miss. 2001). “The other statute, § 97-23-25 concerns embezzlement carries a penalty of “imprisonment in the penitentiary not more than ten years, or be fined not more than one thousand dollars and imprisoned in the county jail not more than one year, or either.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.