Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7 (2026)
Gambling devices defined; prohibition; pin ball machines; penalties; exceptions
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1) Except as otherwise provided in Section 97-33-8, it shall be unlawful for any person or persons, firm, copartnership or corporation to have in possession, own, control, display, or operate any cane rack, knife rack, artful dodger, punch board, roll down, merchandise wheel, slot machine, pinball machine, or similar device or devices. Provided, however, that this section shall not be so construed as to make unlawful the ownership, possession, control, display or operation of any antique coin machine as defined in Section 27-27-12, or any music machine or bona fide automatic vending machine where the purchaser receives exactly the same quantity of merchandise on each operation of said machine. Any slot machine other than an antique coin machine as defined in Section 27-27-12 which delivers, or is so constructed as that by operation thereof it will deliver to the operator thereof anything of value in varying quantities, in addition to the merchandise received, and any slot machine other than an antique coin machine as defined in Section 27-27-12 that is constructed in such manner as that slugs, tokens, coins or similar devices are, or may be, used and delivered to the operator thereof in addition to merchandise of any sort contained in such machine, is hereby declared to be a gambling device, and shall be deemed unlawful under the provisions of this section. Provided, however, that pinball machines which do not return to the operator or player thereof anything but free additional games or plays shall not be deemed to be gambling devices, and neither this section nor any other law shall be construed to prohibit same.
- (2) No property right shall exist in any person, natural or artificial, or be vested in such person, in any or all of the devices described herein that are not exempted from the provisions of this section; and all such devices are hereby declared to be at all times subject to confiscation and destruction, and their possession shall be unlawful, except when in the possession of officers carrying out the provisions of this section. It shall be the duty of all law enforcing officers to seize and immediately destroy all such machines and devices.
- (3) A first violation of the provisions of this section shall be deemed a misdemeanor, and the party offending shall, upon conviction, be fined in any sum not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), or imprisoned not exceeding three (3) months, or both, in the discretion of the court. In the event of a second conviction for a violation of any of the provisions of this section, the party offending shall be subject to a sentence of not less than six (6) months in the county jail, nor more than two (2) years in the State Penitentiary, in the discretion of the trial court.
- (4) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, it shall not be unlawful to operate any equipment or device described in subsection (1) of this section or any gaming, gambling or similar device or devices by whatever name called while:
- (a) On a cruise vessel as defined in Section 27-109-1 whenever such vessel is in the waters within the State of Mississippi, which lie adjacent to the State of Mississippi south of the three (3) most southern counties in the State of Mississippi, including the Mississippi Sound, St. Louis Bay, Biloxi Bay and Pascagoula Bay, and in which the registered voters of the county in which the port is located have not voted to prohibit such betting, gaming or wagering on cruise vessels as provided in Section 19-3-79;
- (b) In a structure located, in whole or in part, on shore in any of the three (3) most southern counties in the State of Mississippi in which the registered voters of the county have voted to allow such betting, gaming or wagering on cruise vessels as provided in Section 19-3-79, if:
- (i) The structure is owned, leased or controlled by a person possessing a gaming license, as defined in Section 75-76-5, to conduct legal gaming on a cruise vessel under paragraph (a) of this subsection;
- (ii) The part of the structure in which licensed gaming activities are conducted is located entirely in an area which is located no more than eight hundred (800) feet from the mean high-water line (as defined in Section 29-15-1) of the waters within the State of Mississippi, which lie adjacent to the State of Mississippi south of the three (3) most southern counties in the State of Mississippi, including the Mississippi Sound, St. Louis Bay, Biloxi Bay and Pascagoula Bay, or, with regard to Harrison County only, no farther north than the southern boundary of the right-of-way for U.S. Highway 90, whichever is greater; and
- (iii) In the case of a structure that is located in whole or part on shore, the part of the structure in which licensed gaming activities are conducted shall lie adjacent to state waters south of the three (3) most southern counties in the State of Mississippi, including the Mississippi Sound, St. Louis Bay, Biloxi Bay and Pascagoula Bay. When the site upon which the structure is located consists of a parcel of real property, easements and rights-of-way for public streets and highways shall not be construed to interrupt the contiguous nature of the parcel, nor shall the footage contained within the easements and rights-of-way be counted in the calculation of the distances specified in subparagraph (ii);
- (c) On a vessel as defined in Section 27-109-1 whenever such vessel is on the Mississippi River or navigable waters within any county bordering on the Mississippi River, and in which the registered voters of the county in which the port is located have not voted to prohibit such betting, gaming or wagering on vessels as provided in Section 19-3-79; or
- (d) That is legal under the laws of the State of Mississippi.
- (5) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, it shall not be unlawful (a) to own, possess, repair or control any gambling device, machine or equipment in a licensed gaming establishment or on the business premises appurtenant to any such licensed gaming establishment during any period of time in which such licensed gaming establishment is being constructed, repaired, maintained or operated in this state; (b) to install any gambling device, machine or equipment in any licensed gaming establishment; (c) to possess or control any gambling device, machine or equipment during the process of procuring or transporting such device, machine or equipment for installation on any such licensed gaming establishment; or (d) to store in a warehouse or other storage facility any gambling device, machine, equipment, or part thereof, regardless of whether the county or municipality in which the warehouse or storage facility is located has approved gaming aboard cruise vessels or vessels, provided that such device, machine or equipment is operated only in a county or municipality that has approved gaming aboard cruise vessels or vessels. Any gambling device, machine or equipment that is owned, possessed, controlled, installed, procured, repaired, transported or stored in accordance with this subsection shall not be subject to confiscation, seizure or destruction, and any person, firm, partnership or corporation which owns, possesses, controls, installs, procures, repairs, transports or stores any gambling device, machine or equipment in accordance with this subsection shall not be subject to any prosecution or penalty under this section. Any person constructing or repairing such cruise vessels or vessels within a municipality shall comply with all municipal ordinances protecting the general health or safety of the residents of the municipality.
Codes, 1930, § 821; 1942, § 2047; Laws, 1924, ch. 339; Laws, 1938, ch. 353; Laws, 1950, ch. 357; Laws, 1990, ch. 573, § 10; Laws, 1990 Ex Sess, ch. 45 § 149; Laws, 1992, ch. 371, § 5; 1994, ch. 530, § 1 eff. 7/1/1994; Laws, 2005, 5th Ex Sess, ch. 16, § 4, eff. 10/17/2005.
Amended by Laws, 2013, ch. 410, HB 974, 3, eff. 7/1/2013.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1985–2006 · leading case: Trainer v. State, 930 So. 2d 373 (Miss. 2006).
Trainer v. State, 930 So. 2d 373 (Miss. 2006). “We affirm the trial court's judgment which specifically allowed seizure of these machines under Miss.Code Ann. §§ 97-33-7 and -17, as we do not find these statutes to be unconstitutional.”
Mississippi Gaming Com'n v. Henson, 800 So. 2d 110 (Miss. 2001). “§ 75-76-5(ff) (2000) in order to determine what *117 constitutes a prohibited slot machine under Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7. I do not disagree with the majority's interpretation; I find the statute itself to be the problem.”
Grey v. Grey, 638 So. 2d 488 (Miss. 1994). “Whether the chancellor erred in interpreting Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7 (2) as a bar to ownership of video poker machines; and E.”
MS GAMING COM'N v. Six Video Gamb. Devices, 792 So. 2d 321 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7 (Rev.2000). The Gaming Commission later filed a petition to permit the destruction of the machines.”
Beatty v. State, 627 So. 2d 355 (Miss. 1993). “Beatty was charged with the possession of illegal gambling devices pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7 (1972 & Supp. 1992) in the Justice Court of Lowndes County.”
Casino Magic Corp. v. Ladner, 666 So. 2d 452 (Miss. 1995). “2 and Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7 . The testimony of Mark Smith, based upon his site inspection and the maps' labels indicating that the water for the site was a bayou and not part of the Mississippi Sound, was the MGC's primary evidence to refute Dr.”
Champluvier v. State, 942 So. 2d 145 (Miss. 2006). “See Miss.Code Ann. §§ 97-33-7, -17. Trainer invited us to consider the criminal statutes in conjunction with certain civil statutes and Mississippi Gaming Commission regulations to conclude that the criminal statutes were unconstitutional in their *154 application and…”
Citation Bingo, Ltd. v. Otten, 910 P.2d 281 (N.M. 1995). “1995) (authorizing video draw poker); Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7(4) (1994) (authorizing use of gambling devices on certain vessels operating in the Mississippi River); Mont.”
Jernigan v. State of Miss., 812 F. Supp. 688 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7; Miss.Code Ann. §§ 97-43-1 et seq.”
Midwestern Enter., Inc. v. Stenehjem, 2001 ND 67 (N.D. 2001). “Prohibited by Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7 is: Any slot machine other than an antique coin machine as defined in Section 27-27-12 which delivers, or is so constructed as that by operation thereof it will deliver to the operator thereof anything of value in varying quantities, in…”
Hattiesburg Area Senior Serv., Inc. v. Lamar Cnty., 633 So. 2d 440 (Miss. 1994). “Beatty failed to raise the issue the majority reversed upon, nor did the record support the allegations that the slot machines in question were more than 25 years of age, qualifying as antiques. Under the new statute § 27-27-12 (Supp.”
Concerned Citizens v. MISS. GAMING COM'N, 735 So. 2d 368 (Miss. 1999). “§ 27-109-1(2) (1990) and Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7(4)(a) and (b) (1994).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7(1) — 3 cases
Mississippi Gaming Com'n v. Henson, 800 So. 2d 110 (Miss. 2001). “§ 75-76-5(ff) (2000) in order to determine what *117 constitutes a prohibited slot machine under Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7. I do not disagree with the majority's interpretation; I find the statute itself to be the problem.”
Trainer v. State, 930 So. 2d 373 (Miss. 2006). “We affirm the trial court's judgment which specifically allowed seizure of these machines under Miss.Code Ann. §§ 97-33-7 and -17, as we do not find these statutes to be unconstitutional.”
MS GAMING COM'N v. Six Video Gamb. Devices, 792 So. 2d 321 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7 (Rev.2000). The Gaming Commission later filed a petition to permit the destruction of the machines.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7(1)(2000) — 1 case
Mississippi Gaming Com'n v. Henson, 800 So. 2d 110 (Miss. 2001). “§ 75-76-5(ff) (2000) in order to determine what *117 constitutes a prohibited slot machine under Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7. I do not disagree with the majority's interpretation; I find the statute itself to be the problem.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7(2) — 3 cases
MS GAMING COM'N v. Six Video Gamb. Devices, 792 So. 2d 321 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7 (Rev.2000). The Gaming Commission later filed a petition to permit the destruction of the machines.”
Trainer v. State, 930 So. 2d 373 (Miss. 2006). “We affirm the trial court's judgment which specifically allowed seizure of these machines under Miss.Code Ann. §§ 97-33-7 and -17, as we do not find these statutes to be unconstitutional.”
Jernigan v. State of Miss., 812 F. Supp. 688 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7; Miss.Code Ann. §§ 97-43-1 et seq.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7(4) — 2 cases
Citation Bingo, Ltd. v. Otten, 910 P.2d 281 (N.M. 1995). “1995) (authorizing video draw poker); Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7(4) (1994) (authorizing use of gambling devices on certain vessels operating in the Mississippi River); Mont.”
Jernigan v. State of Miss., 812 F. Supp. 688 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7; Miss.Code Ann. §§ 97-43-1 et seq.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7(4)(a) — 1 case
Concerned Citizens v. MISS. GAMING COM'N, 735 So. 2d 368 (Miss. 1999). “§ 27-109-1(2) (1990) and Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-7(4)(a) and (b) (1994).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.