Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 141
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 141.120 (2026)

No execution for two years

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  141.120.  No execution for two years — redemption by owner. — After judgment shall have been rendered, no execution shall be levied thereon nor sale under said execution had for a period of two years from the date of entry of such judgment, during which time the owner of the property against which judgment has been rendered, or any person having an interest therein, may redeem the property from said judgment by paying the amount of the judgment, interest and costs, or the amount set as a compromise payment under the terms of this law, and if such payment be made, the judgment shall be released and the taxes marked paid.

­­--------

(RSMo 1939 § 11189, A.L. 1945 p. 1946 § 11383)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–1982 · leading case: Goldberg v. State Tax Comm'n, 639 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goldberg v. State Tax Comm'n, 639 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. 1982). · cites it 5× “The legislature of Kentucky resolved the conflict by deleting § 141.”
Garzee v. Sauro, 639 S.W.2d 830 (Mo. 1982). “To the petition, respondents filed a joint motion to dismiss or for summary judgment to which suggestions in support of the motion were attached, urging that appellants’ claim could not be maintained because of governmental or sovereign immunity; that appellants’ allegations of…”
Garzee v. Sauro, 623 S.W.2d 579 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981). “y, filed a joint motion to dismiss or for summary judgment to which suggestions in support of the motion were attached, urging that appellants’ claim could not be maintained as a class action (which is not here in issue); that it could not be maintained because of governmental…”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 141.120(2) — 1 case
Goldberg v. State Tax Comm'n, 639 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. 1982). “The legislature of Kentucky resolved the conflict by deleting § 141.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 141.120(2)(3) — 1 case
Goldberg v. State Tax Comm'n, 639 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. 1982). “The legislature of Kentucky resolved the conflict by deleting § 141.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.