Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 295.090 (2026)

Labor agreements

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

295.090. Labor agreements — renewal. — All collective bargaining labor agreements hereafter entered into between the management of a utility and its employees or any craft or class of employees shall be reduced to writing and continue for a period of not less than one year from the date of the expiration of the previous agreement entered into between the management of the utility and its employees or if there has been no such previous agreement then for a period of not less than one year from the date of the actual execution of the agreement. Such agreement shall be presumed to continue in force and effect from year to year after the date fixed for its original termination unless either or both parties thereto inform the other, in writing, of the specific changes desired to be made therein and shall also file a copy of such demands with the state board of mediation, at least sixty days before the original termination date or sixty days before the end of any yearly renewal period, or sixty days before any termination date desired thereafter.

--------

(L. 1947 V. I p. 358 § 10)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1951–1958 · leading case: State Ex Rel. State Bd. of Mediation v. Pigg, 244 S.W.2d 75 (Mo. 1951).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State Ex Rel. State Bd. of Mediation v. Pigg, 244 S.W.2d 75 (Mo. 1951). · cites it 2× “Section 295.090 deals with “collective bargaining labor agreements hereafter entered into,” and requires them to be reduced to writing, fixes their minimum duration at one year, provides for their continuance from year to year, unless either or both parties thereto inform the…”

State v. Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chem. & Atomic Workers Int'l Union, 317 S.W.2d 309 (Mo. 1958). · cites it 2× “6 is not in conflict with the federal Act and is, therefore, not unconstitutional. The sections which we have considered are severable from and may stand independently of the remainder of the Act.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.