301.650. Scope of law — method of perfecting liens or encumbrances is exclusive. — 1. Sections 301.600 to 301.660 do not apply to or affect:
(1) A lien given by statute or rule of law to a supplier of services or materials for the motor vehicle or trailer;
(2) A lien given by statute to the United States, this state or any political subdivision of this state;
(3) A lien or encumbrance on a motor vehicle or trailer created by a manufacturer or dealer who holds the motor vehicle or trailer for sale;
(4) A lien or encumbrance on any manufactured home, as defined in section 700.010;
(5) A lien for delinquent child support or spousal support given by section 454.516.
2. The method provided in sections 301.600 to 301.660 of perfecting and giving notice of liens or encumbrances subject to sections 301.600 to 301.660 is exclusive.
Notes of Decisions
Bradley v. K & E Investments, Inc., 847 S.W.2d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 2× “See § 301.650, RSMo 1986. [6] In his dissent, Chief Judge Parrish states his view that the judgments should be reversed and the causes remanded to the trial court because the Charlestons, operators of Country Auto Sales, are indispensable parties who were not joined in these…”
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Pedersen, 575 S.W.2d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978).
· cites it 2× “Unless excepted by section 301.650, a lien or encumbrance on a motor vehicle or trailer, as defined by section 301.”
In Re Jackson, 268 F. Supp. 434 (E.D. Mo. 1967).
· cites it 2× “Section 301.650, V.A.M.S., expressly so states.”
VTCC, Inc. v. Brown (In Re Brown), 55 B.R. 172 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1985).
· cites it 4× “010, is not valid against subsequent transferees or lienholders of the motor vehicle or trailer who took without knowledge of *173 the lien or encumbrance unless the lien or encumbrance is perfected as provided in sections 301.”
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. City of St. Louis, 663 S.W.2d 408 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 5× “” Section 301.650(2) RSMo 1978. By statute, municipalities may establish ordinances concerning rules of the road or traffic regulations necessary to meet their needs and traffic conditions.”
Carlson v. Seeley (In re Maxwell), 89 B.R. 46 (W.D. Mo. 1988).
· cites it 2× “Unless excepted by section 301.650, a lien or encumbrance on a motor vehicle or trailer, as defined by section 301.”
In re Keith, 3 B.R. 382 (E.D. Mo. 1980).
“§ 301.650, R.S.Mo. (1969). The bank concededly did not so comply.”
In Re Merrill, 258 B.R. 750 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2001).
· cites it 2× “Unless excepted by section 301.650, a hen or encumbrance on a motor vehicle or trailer, as defined by section 301.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 301.650(2) — 2 cases
VTCC, Inc. v. Brown (In Re Brown), 55 B.R. 172 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1985).
“010, is not valid against subsequent transferees or lienholders of the motor vehicle or trailer who took without knowledge of *173 the lien or encumbrance unless the lien or encumbrance is perfected as provided in sections 301.”
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. City of St. Louis, 663 S.W.2d 408 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).
“” Section 301.650(2) RSMo 1978. By statute, municipalities may establish ordinances concerning rules of the road or traffic regulations necessary to meet their needs and traffic conditions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.