358.180. Rules determining rights and duties of partners. — The rights and duties of the partners in relation to the partnership shall be determined, subject to any agreement between them, by the following rules:
(1) Each partner shall be repaid the partner's contributions, whether by way of capital or advances to the partnership property and share equally in the profits and surplus remaining after all liabilities, including those to partners, are satisfied; and except as provided in subsection 2 of section 358.150, each partner must contribute toward the losses, whether of capital or otherwise, sustained by the partnership according to the partner's share in the profits;
(2) The partnership must indemnify every partner in respect of payments made and personal liabilities reasonably incurred by the partner in the ordinary and proper conduct of its business, or for the preservation of its business or property;
(3) A partner, who in aid of the partnership makes any payment or advance beyond the amount of capital which the partner agreed to contribute, shall be paid interest from the date of the payment or advance;
(4) A partner shall receive interest on the capital contributed by the partner only from the date when repayment should be made;
(5) All partners have equal rights in the management and conduct of the partnership business;
(6) No partner is entitled to remuneration for acting in the partnership business, except that a surviving partner is entitled to reasonable compensation for the partner's services in winding up the partnership affairs;
(7) No person can become a member of a partnership without the consent of all the partners; and
(8) Any difference arising as to ordinary matters connected with the partnership business may be decided by a majority of the partners; but no act in contravention of any agreement between the partners may be done rightfully without the consent of all the partners.
Notes of Decisions
Ohlendorf v. Feinstein, 697 S.W.2d 553 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 10× “2d 641 (1951) did use a Tennessee statute which corresponds to the Uniform Partnership Act and § 358.180 RSMo 1978 as authority for granting attorney’s fees to the partners who initiated a lawsuit against an errant partner.”
Patrick Blanks v. Fluor Corp., 450 S.W.3d 308 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “180 of the Missouri Partnership Act (setting forth rules by which the rights of duties of partners are to be determined, noting that those rights and duties are subject to any agreement between the partners). In other words, the partnership agreement governs, and the rights and…”
Heath v. Spitzmiller, 663 S.W.2d 351 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 5× “§§ 358.180 and 358.400, RSMo 1978. Partnerships rest on contract and the rights and liabilities of the partners, though fixed by law, are subject to agreement and the rights of a party leaving a partnership may be determined by such an agreement.”
Ebest v. Bruce, 734 S.W.2d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 5× “The provisions for indemnity of partners from partners contained in Section 358.180 RSMo 1978 have been interpreted to not include attorney’s fees.”
Haynes v. Allen, 482 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972).
· cites it 5× “In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, Section 358.180, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., governs the rights and duties of the partners upon dissolution.”
Nesler v. Reed, 703 S.W.2d 520 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 3× “Section 358.180(7) RSMo.1978, provides that no person can become a member óf a partnership without the consent of all the partners.”
Warren v. Warren, 784 S.W.2d 247 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 2× “Section 358.180 3 enunciates the rules determining the rights and duties of a partner.”
Schoeller v. Schoeller, 497 S.W.2d 860 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973).
· cites it 3× “It is the general rule that no member of a partnership is entitled to compensation as salary in the absence of an agreement, either express or implied, that such be paid, even during the existence of a partnership.”
Clark v. Francis, 422 S.W.3d 369 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 4× “” He argues that the evidence demonstrated that the agreement he and Francis made arose before any of the entities at issue were created; thus, he and Francis’s alleged partnership predated all other partnerships at issue, thereby requiring the other individuals and entities…”
Veatch v. Black, 250 S.W.2d 501 (Mo. 1952).
“§ 358.180(6), B,SMo 1949; 40 Am. Jur. 348 , § 314.”
Sheridan v. McBaine, 660 S.W.2d 188 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).
“The Crane heirs contend that, on the analogy of partnership law [§ 358.180], a venturer is not entitled to remuneration for conduct of the joint venture business.”
Russell v. Est. of Chapman, 789 S.W.2d 504 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 2× “” The trial court, citing § 358.180, RSMo 1986, ruled that if the $35,891.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 358.180(1) — 3 cases
Heath v. Spitzmiller, 663 S.W.2d 351 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).
“§§ 358.180 and 358.400, RSMo 1978. Partnerships rest on contract and the rights and liabilities of the partners, though fixed by law, are subject to agreement and the rights of a party leaving a partnership may be determined by such an agreement.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 358.180(2) — 1 case
Ohlendorf v. Feinstein, 697 S.W.2d 553 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).
“2d 641 (1951) did use a Tennessee statute which corresponds to the Uniform Partnership Act and § 358.180 RSMo 1978 as authority for granting attorney’s fees to the partners who initiated a lawsuit against an errant partner.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 358.180(4) — 1 case
Haynes v. Allen, 482 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972).
“In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, Section 358.180, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., governs the rights and duties of the partners upon dissolution.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 358.180(5) — 1 case
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 358.180(6) — 2 cases
Schoeller v. Schoeller, 497 S.W.2d 860 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973).
“It is the general rule that no member of a partnership is entitled to compensation as salary in the absence of an agreement, either express or implied, that such be paid, even during the existence of a partnership.”
Veatch v. Black, 250 S.W.2d 501 (Mo. 1952).
“§ 358.180(6), B,SMo 1949; 40 Am. Jur. 348 , § 314.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 358.180(7) — 4 cases
Nesler v. Reed, 703 S.W.2d 520 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).
“Section 358.180(7) RSMo.1978, provides that no person can become a member óf a partnership without the consent of all the partners.”
Clark v. Francis, 422 S.W.3d 369 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
“” He argues that the evidence demonstrated that the agreement he and Francis made arose before any of the entities at issue were created; thus, he and Francis’s alleged partnership predated all other partnerships at issue, thereby requiring the other individuals and entities…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.