Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 375.942 (2026)

Administrative order for prohibited practices

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  375.942.  Administrative order for prohibited practices — penalty. — 1.  If the director determines that an insurer has engaged, is engaging, or has taken a substantial step toward engaging in an act, practice, or course of business constituting a violation of sections 375.930 to 375.948 or a rule adopted or order issued pursuant thereto, or that a person has materially aided or is materially aiding a practice constituting a violation of sections 375.930 to 375.948 or a rule adopted or order issued pursuant thereto, the director may issue such administrative orders as authorized under section 374.046.  Each practice in violation of section 375.934 is a level two violation under section 374.049.  Each act as part of a trade practice does not constitute a separate violation under section 374.049.  The director may also suspend or revoke the license or certificate of authority of an insurer for any willful violation.

  2.  If the director believes that an insurer has engaged, is engaging in, or has taken a substantial step toward engaging in an act, practice or course of business constituting a violation of sections 375.930 to 375.948 or a rule adopted or order issued pursuant thereto, or that a person has materially aided or is materially aiding an act, practice, omission, or course of business conduct constituting a violation of sections 375.930 to 375.948 or a rule adopted or order issued pursuant thereto, the director may maintain a civil action for relief authorized under section 374.048. Each practice in violation of section 375.934 is a level two violation under section 374.049.  Each act as part of a trade practice does not constitute a separate violation under section 374.049.

­­--------

(L. 1959 H.B. 251 § 7, A.L. 1978 H.B. 1447, A.L. 1991 S.B. 53, A.L. 2007 S.B. 66)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1981–2016 · leading case: Farm Bureau Town & Country Ins. Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348 (Mo. 1995).
Farm Bureau Town & Country Ins. Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348 (Mo. 1995). “§ 375.942. That determination is then subject to judicial review.”
Tufts v. Madesco Inv. Corp., 524 F. Supp. 484 (E.D. Mo. 1981). “The Missouri Act contains a similar, yet critically different, provision in § 375.942(5). That section reads as follows: No order of the director under sections 375.”
Ludwick v. Harbinger Grp., Inc., 161 F. Supp. 3d 769 (W.D. Mo. 2016). · cites it 2× “4 (“No order of the director under section 375.942 or order of a court to enforce the same shall in any way relieve or absolve any person affected by such order from any liability under any other laws of this state.”
Saunders v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 515 F. Supp. 2d 1009 (W.D. Mo. 2007). · cites it 2× “The Unfair Trade Practices Act states, “no order of the director under section 375.942 or order of a court to enforce the same shall in any way relieve or absolve any person affected by such order from any liability under any other laws of this State.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 375.942(5) — 1 case
Tufts v. Madesco Inv. Corp., 524 F. Supp. 484 (E.D. Mo. 1981). “The Missouri Act contains a similar, yet critically different, provision in § 375.942(5). That section reads as follows: No order of the director under sections 375.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.