435.390. Change of award by arbitrators. — On application of a party or, if an application to the court is pending under section 435.400, 435.405 or 435.410, on submission to the arbitrators by the court under such conditions as the court may order, the arbitrators may modify or correct the award upon the grounds stated in subdivisions (1) and (3) of subsection 1 of section 435.410, or for the purpose of clarifying the award. The application shall be made within twenty days after delivery of the award to the applicant. Written notice thereof shall be given forthwith to the opposing party, stating he must serve his objections thereto, if any, within ten days from the notice. The award so modified or corrected is subject to the provisions of sections 435.400, 435.405 and 435.410.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 1990–1995 · leading case:
Heineman v. Charno, 877 S.W.2d 224 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
Heineman v. Charno, 877 S.W.2d 224 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 13× “While drawn as three separate points, it can readily be observed that the thrust of Chamo’s position is that the arbitrator, either by virtue of statutory law or the Association’s Rules, did not have the right to enter the amended award, and Char-no did not waive objection to…”
Nat'l Avenue Bldg. Co. v. Stewart, 910 S.W.2d 334 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 4× “11 The trial court’s efforts to compel the arbitrators to “clarify” the award were evidently based § 435.390. 12 As recounted in our 1990 opinion, 794 S.”
Gaines v. Fin. Plan. Consultants, Inc., 857 S.W.2d 430 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 3× “Louis County to change the arbitrators’ award pursuant to Section 435.390, RSMo 1986, under Missouri’s Uniform Arbitration Act.”
Nat'l Avenue Bldg. Co. v. Stewart, 794 S.W.2d 304 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 2× “Section 435.390, mentioned earlier, permits a trial court to set conditions under which the arbitrators may modify or correct the award in certain limited instances, or clarify it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.