Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 527.090 (2026)
Jury trial
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
527.090. Jury trial. — When a proceeding under sections 527.010 to 527.130 involves the determination of an issue of fact, such issue may be tried and determined in the same manner as issues of fact are tried and determined in other civil actions in the court in which the proceeding is pending.
--------
(RSMo 1939 § 1134)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1953–2021 · leading case: Payne v. Cunningham, 549 S.W.3d 43 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
Payne v. Cunningham, 549 S.W.3d 43 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). “y and refused to join Appellants' suit for breach of contract, (2) they had no adequate remedy at law because the transaction required ongoing collaboration with Sellers, (3) they made a submissible case for breach of contract warranting specific performance, particularly in…”
Fid. & Cas. Co. of New York v. W. Cas. & Sur. Co., 337 S.W.2d 566 (Mo. Ct. App. 1960). “Statutory authority for the submission of any issues of fact to a jury are found in § 527.090 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. It is well settled that for a case to be the proper subject for a declaratory judgment action, a justiciable controversy must exist which admits of specific relief…”
State Ex Rel. Chase Resorts, Inc. v. Campbell, 913 S.W.2d 832 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). “Nor do we find any right to a jury trial in these circumstances by reason of the Declaratory Judgment Act, § 527.090, RSMo 1994, which provides: When a proceeding under sections 527.”
Turnbull v. Car Wash Specialties, LLC, 272 S.W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). “” Section 527.090 RSMo 2000. Thus, in a trial on a petition for declaratory judgment, the court must determine what issues should be tried to the court and what issues should be reserved for the jury’s determination.”
K.D.R. v. D.E.S., 637 S.W.2d 691 (Mo. 1982). “The father appealed to the court of appeals, western district, and, as stated above, the cause was subsequently ordered transferred to this Court. Appellant contends this is a declaratory judgment action brought pursuant to Chapter 527, RSMo 1978, and that he is entitled to a…”
MFA Mut. Ins. Co. v. Quinn, 259 S.W.2d 854 (Mo. Ct. App. 1953). “135435, was issued June 29, 1948, for a period ending December 29, 1948, "and for terms of such duration thereafter as the required renewal premium is paid by the insured on or before expiration of the current term and accepted by the company.”
Durwood v. Dubinsky, 291 S.W.2d 909 (Mo. 1956). “We shall consider the correctness of the reference of each count in the order in which the issues were first raised by the pleadings. Count I corresponded with the original petition and sought relief in the form of a declaratory judgment.”
Miller v. Russell, 593 S.W.2d 598 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979). “These concepts merely serve to assure minimum rights. Both by statutes and by judicial interpretation, jury trials have been made available in expanded areas beyond those protected by the constitutional guarantee.”
Collins v. Jenkins, 821 S.W.2d 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992). “On appeal, the Supreme Court of Missouri held the paternity issue was purely a fact question, hence the putative father had a right to jury trial under § 527.090, RSMo 1978 (a provision of the Declaratory Judgment Act).”
West Lake Quarry & Material Co. v. City of Bridgeton, 761 S.W.2d 749 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). “In its final point, the City asserts that it was entitled to a jury trial pursuant to RSMo § 527.090 (1986). Section 527.090 provides for a jury trial in declaratory judgment actions involving the determination of issues of fact in the same manner as issues of fact are tried and…”
Hudson v. Jones, 278 S.W.2d 799 (Mo. Ct. App. 1955). “080, and for trial of the issues of fact by a jury by Section 527.090. Thus, if the obligations of the defendants under the contract and deed be found as claimed in the petition, the court could, under the statutes cited, conduct a jury determination of the issue of any…”
Farmers All. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Reed, 530 S.W.2d 470 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975). “; § 527.090 V.A.M.S.; MFA Mutual Insurance Company v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.