561.026. Disqualification from voting and jury service. — Notwithstanding any other provision of law except for section 610.140, a person who is convicted:
(1) Of any offense shall be disqualified from registering and voting in any election under the laws of this state while confined under a sentence of imprisonment;
(2) Of a felony or misdemeanor connected with the exercise of the right of suffrage shall be forever disqualified from registering and voting;
(3) Of any felony shall be forever disqualified from serving as a juror.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case:
Uxa Ex Rel. Uxa v. Marconi, 128 S.W.3d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
Uxa Ex Rel. Uxa v. Marconi, 128 S.W.3d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 7× “Dorel requests that we find that the verdict is a nullity and void as a matter of law, or in the alternative, Dorel requests a new trial based on the nondisclosure by the jurors.”
Chandler v. Allen, 108 S.W.3d 756 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “1, RSMo 2000, and from voting, § 561.026(1), RSMo 2000, while serving their sentence for the conviction.”
State v. Martinelli, 972 S.W.2d 424 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 2× “Moreover, section 561.026(3) provides that a person who is convicted of any felony shall be forever disqualified from serving as a juror.”
United States v. Presley, 667 F. Supp. 678 (W.D. Mo. 1987).
· cites it 3× “Section 561.026(3), RSMo. The Government contends, however, that defendant is also ineligible for service as a sheriff (§ 57.”
State v. McGinnis, 622 S.W.2d 416 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981).
“§ 561.026. Whether or not a prospective juror’s intentional failure to respond to a voir dire question will entitle a defendant to a new trial is within the discretion of the trial court.”
United States v. Solomon, 826 F. Supp. 1221 (E.D. Mo. 1993).
· cites it 2× “021 RSMo (1986), defendant can not hold public office during the term of his probation; (6) under § 561.026(3) RSMo (1986), he is disqualified from being a juror; (7) under § 491.”
Foxworth v. Foxworth, 732 S.W.2d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 14× “None of the following persons shall be appointed as a personal representative: (3) A person who is under legal disability as a result of conviction of a crime; Section 561.026, RSMo Cum.Supp.1984, the revision in effect at the time letters testamentary were issued to respondent,…”
United States v. Caron, 941 F. Supp. 238 (D. Mass. 1996).
“” Mo.Rev.Stat. § 561.026(3) (emphasis added), cited in Presley, 851 F.”
State of Missouri v. Arizona Hall, Jr., 472 S.W.3d 207 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “Mo. Rev. Stat. § 561.026 (1). Restoration of the right to vote does not demonstrate that Missouri substantially restored Defendant's civil, rights.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 561.026(1) — 1 case
Chandler v. Allen, 108 S.W.3d 756 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
“1, RSMo 2000, and from voting, § 561.026(1), RSMo 2000, while serving their sentence for the conviction.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 561.026(2) — 1 case
Foxworth v. Foxworth, 732 S.W.2d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).
“None of the following persons shall be appointed as a personal representative: (3) A person who is under legal disability as a result of conviction of a crime; Section 561.026, RSMo Cum.Supp.1984, the revision in effect at the time letters testamentary were issued to respondent,…”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 561.026(3) — 7 cases
Uxa Ex Rel. Uxa v. Marconi, 128 S.W.3d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
“Dorel requests that we find that the verdict is a nullity and void as a matter of law, or in the alternative, Dorel requests a new trial based on the nondisclosure by the jurors.”
Chandler v. Allen, 108 S.W.3d 756 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
“1, RSMo 2000, and from voting, § 561.026(1), RSMo 2000, while serving their sentence for the conviction.”
State v. Martinelli, 972 S.W.2d 424 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
“Moreover, section 561.026(3) provides that a person who is convicted of any felony shall be forever disqualified from serving as a juror.”
United States v. Presley, 667 F. Supp. 678 (W.D. Mo. 1987).
“Section 561.026(3), RSMo. The Government contends, however, that defendant is also ineligible for service as a sheriff (§ 57.”
United States v. Solomon, 826 F. Supp. 1221 (E.D. Mo. 1993).
“021 RSMo (1986), defendant can not hold public office during the term of his probation; (6) under § 561.026(3) RSMo (1986), he is disqualified from being a juror; (7) under § 491.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.