Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 563.070 (2026)
Accidents an excuse for offense, when
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
563.070. Accidents an excuse for offense, when. — 1. Conduct which would otherwise constitute an offense under chapter 565 is excusable and not criminal when it is the result of accident in any lawful act by lawful means without knowingly causing or attempting to cause physical injury and without acting with criminal negligence.
2. The defendant shall have the burden of injecting the issue of excuse authorized under this section.
--------
(L. 1983 S.B. 276, A.L. 1984 S.B. 448 § A, A.L. 2014 S.B. 491)
Effective 1-01-17
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1968–2025 · leading case: State v. Smith, 431 S.W.2d 74 (Mo. 1968).
State v. Smith, 431 S.W.2d 74 (Mo. 1968). “Defendant was found guilty by a jury of knowingly transporting a female through the state for the purpose of prostitution in violation of Section 563.070, (all section references are to RSMo 1959, V.”
State v. Mallett, 732 S.W.2d 527 (Mo. 1987). “No need exists, however, for a separate instruction on accident because, under the current Missouri statute on the defense of accident, § 563.070, RSMo 1986 (effective October 1, 1984, five months before the murder of Trooper Froemsdorf), a finding of the elements of any…”
State v. Reyes, 740 S.W.2d 257 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987). “In view of the changes in the law resulting from the passage of § 563.070, effective on October 1, 1984, the defendant's reliance on Cook, supra, 696 S.”
State v. Franklin, 752 S.W.2d 937 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). “Pursuant to Section 563.070, RSMo (1986), conduct which would constitute a crime under Chapter 565 "is excusable and not criminal when it is the result of accident in any lawful act by lawful means without knowingly causing or attempting to cause physical injury and without…”
State v. Miller, 772 S.W.2d 782 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989). “See § 563.070, RSMo Supp.1984; Black's Law Dictionary 30-31 (4th ed.”
State v. Simmons, 751 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). “Section 563.070, R.S.Mo., 1986. State v. Branch, — S.”
State v. Mason, 571 S.W.2d 246 (Mo. 1978). “uing without intermission or recurring regularly after minute interruptions * * ” The word “through” is defined by the same dictionary as: “1 a * * * (3) — used as a function word to indicate extension from one end or boundary (as of a place or area) to another [a road * * * the…”
State v. Huff, 789 S.W.2d 71 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990). “*79 Huff’s tendered instruction A on excusable accident is based on § 563.070, RSMo (1986) which reads: 1. Conduct which would otherwise constitute a crime under chapter 565, RSMo, is excusable and not criminal when it is the result of accident in any lawful act by lawful means…”
State v. Robinson, 555 S.W.2d 667 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977). “PER CURIAM Defendant appeals his felony conviction for transporting a female through the State for the purpose of prostitution — a § 563.070 RSMo 1969 violation. Defendant’s brief is flagrantly deficient and preserves nothing for review.”
State v. Young, 844 S.W.2d 541 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992). “No need exists for a separate instruction on accident, because under § 563.070, RSMo 1986, on the defense of accident, a finding of the elements of any homicide offense is inconsistent with such a defense.”
State v. Garner, 800 S.W.2d 785 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990). “Missouri Revised Statutes § 563.070 (1986) provides that conduct which would constitute a crime under RSMo Chapter 565 “is excusable and not criminal when it is the result of accident in any lawful act by lawful means without knowingly causing or attempting to cause physical…”
State v. Bates, 751 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. 1988). “The defendant was entitled to present his “accident” claim under § 563.070, RSMo 1986, by evidence and argument, but evidence of accident refutes the essential elements of the offense as set out in the verdict director and a specific instruction is not necessary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.