Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.188 (2026)
Failure to report elder abuse or neglect
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
565.188. Failure to report elder abuse or neglect — penalty. — 1. A person commits the offense of failure to report elder abuse or neglect if he or she is required to make a report as required under subdivision (2) of subsection 1 of section 192.2405, and knowingly fails to make a report.
2. The offense of failure to report elder abuse or neglect is a class A misdemeanor.
--------
(L. 1992 S.B. 573 & 634 § 5, A.L. 2003 S.B. 556 & 311, A.L. 2014 S.B. 491)
Effective 1-01-17
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1996–2004 · leading case: State v. Kaiser, 139 S.W.3d 545 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).
State v. Kaiser, 139 S.W.3d 545 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). “(Claywest), appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to jury verdicts, of convictions of class A misdemeanors of failing to report elder abuse under Section 565.188. 1 The court sentenced Kaiser to one year in jail and a fine of $1,000.”
Hohlt v. Complete Health Care, Inc., 936 S.W.2d 223 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996). “1994, provides as follows: Any person, official or institution complying with the provisions of section 565.188 in the making of a report, or in cooperating with the department in any of its activities pursuant to sections 565.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.188(1) — 1 case
State v. Kaiser, 139 S.W.3d 545 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). “(Claywest), appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to jury verdicts, of convictions of class A misdemeanors of failing to report elder abuse under Section 565.188. 1 The court sentenced Kaiser to one year in jail and a fine of $1,000.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.188(2) — 1 case
State v. Kaiser, 139 S.W.3d 545 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). “(Claywest), appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to jury verdicts, of convictions of class A misdemeanors of failing to report elder abuse under Section 565.188. 1 The court sentenced Kaiser to one year in jail and a fine of $1,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.