Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 2-15-124 (2026)

Quasi-Judicial Boards

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 2. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATION

CHAPTER 15. EXECUTIVE BRANCH OFFICERS AND AGENCIES

Part 1. General Provisions

Quasi-Judicial Boards

2-15-124. Quasi-judicial boards. If an agency is designated by law as a quasi-judicial board for the purposes of this section, the following requirements apply:

(1) The number of and qualifications of its members are as prescribed by law.

(2) The governor shall appoint the members. A majority of the members must be appointed to serve for terms concurrent with the gubernatorial term and until their successors are appointed. The remaining members must be appointed to serve for terms ending on the first day of the third January of the succeeding gubernatorial term and until their successors are appointed. It is the intent of this subsection that the governor appoint a majority of the members of each quasi-judicial board at the beginning of the governor's term and the remaining members in the middle of the governor's term. As used in this subsection, "majority" means the next whole number greater than half.

(3) The appointment of each member is subject to the confirmation of the senate then meeting in regular session or next meeting in regular session following the appointment. A member so appointed has all the powers of the office upon assuming that office and is a de jure officer, notwithstanding the fact that the senate has not yet confirmed the appointment. If the senate does not confirm the appointment of a member, the governor shall appoint a new member to serve for the remainder of the term.

(4) A vacancy must be filled in the same manner as regular appointments, and the member appointed to fill a vacancy shall serve for the unexpired term to which the member is appointed.

(5) The governor shall designate the presiding officer. The presiding officer may make and second motions and vote.

(6) Members may be removed by the governor only for cause.

(7) Unless otherwise provided by law, each member is entitled to be paid $100 for each day in which the member is actually and necessarily engaged in the performance of board duties and is also entitled to be reimbursed for travel expenses, as provided for in 2-18-501 through 2-18-503, incurred while in the performance of board duties. Members who are full-time salaried officers or employees of this state or of a political subdivision of this state are not entitled to be compensated for their service as members except when they perform their board duties outside their regular working hours or during time charged against their leave, but those members are entitled to be reimbursed for travel expenses as provided for in 2-18-501 through 2-18-503. Ex officio board members may not receive compensation but must receive travel expenses.

(8) A majority of the membership constitutes a quorum to do business. A favorable vote of at least a majority of the members in attendance at a meeting at which a quorum is present is required to adopt any resolution, motion, or other decision, unless otherwise provided by law.

History: En. 82A-112 by Sec. 1, Ch. 272, L. 1971; amd. Sec. 12, Ch. 358, L. 1973; amd. Sec. 57, Ch. 439, L. 1975; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 186, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 82A-112(1), (2)(a), (3) thru (8); amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 83, L. 1983; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 672, L. 1983; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 650, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 73, Ch. 61, L. 2007; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 377, L. 2023; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 603, L. 2023; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 323, L. 2025.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1988–2020 · leading case: Reynolds v. Pac. Telecom, Inc., 856 P.2d 1365 (Mont. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Reynolds v. Pac. Telecom, Inc., 856 P.2d 1365 (Mont. 1993). · cites it 34× “" Section 2-15-124, MCA, provides that: If an agency is designated by law as a quasi-judicial board for the purposes of this section, the following requirements apply: (1) The number of and qualifications of its members are as prescribed by law.”

Erickson v. Croft, 760 P.2d 706 (Mont. 1988). · cites it 3× “Rule also points out that the Board is not designated by law as a quasi-judicial board pursuant to Section 2-15-124, MCA. See Section 2-15-1867, MCA.”

State Ex Rel. Div. of Workers' Comp. v. Dist. Court of the Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 805 P.2d 1272 (Mont. 1990). · cites it 4× “We conclude that immunity does not attach because the Division is not expressly designated a quasi-judicial board, see § 2-15-124, MCA, see generally Title 2, Chapter 15, MCA, nor was it performing a quasi-judicial function as will be discussed below.”

Newville v. State, Dept. of Fam. Servs., 883 P.2d 793 (Mont. 1994). · cites it 2× “2d at 1276 , which controls here, provides in pertinent part: We conclude that immunity does not attach because the Division is not expressly designated a quasi-judicial board, see § 2-15-124, MCA, see generally Title 2, Chapter 15, MCA, nor was it performing a quasi-judicial…”

George v. Montana Bd. of Pardons, 2001 MT 163 (Mont. 2001). · cites it 8× “Further, § 2-15-124(8), MCA, authorized the Board, as a quasi-judicial body, to make decisions by any two of its members.”

Trout v. Bennett, 830 P.2d 81 (Mont. 1992). · cites it 4× “We conclude that immunity does not attach because the Division is not expressly designated a quasi-judicial board, see § 2-15-124, MCA, see generally Title 2, Chapter 15, MCA, nor was it performing a quasi-judicial function .”

Allum v. State of Montana (D. Mont. 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 2-15- 1019(7); see Mont. Code Ann. § 2-15-124 (3). Montana law also requires the appointment of two legislative liaisons to the board.”

— Mont. Code Ann. § 2-15-124(1) — 1 case

Reynolds v. Pac. Telecom, Inc., 856 P.2d 1365 (Mont. 1993). “" Section 2-15-124, MCA, provides that: If an agency is designated by law as a quasi-judicial board for the purposes of this section, the following requirements apply: (1) The number of and qualifications of its members are as prescribed by law.”

— Mont. Code Ann. § 2-15-124(8) — 2 cases

George v. Montana Bd. of Pardons, 2001 MT 163 (Mont. 2001). “Further, § 2-15-124(8), MCA, authorized the Board, as a quasi-judicial body, to make decisions by any two of its members.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.