25-5-104. Action against business association. When two or more persons associated in any business transact such business under a common name, whether it comprise the names of such persons or not, the associates may be sued by such common name, the summons in such cases being served on one or more of the associates; and the judgment in the action shall bind the joint property of all the associates in the same manner as if all had been named defendants and had been sued upon their joint liability.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 25-5-104 (2026)
Action Against Business Association
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 25. CIVIL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 5. PARTIES
Part 1. Designation of Parties
Action Against Business Association
History: En. Sec. 439, p. 132, Bannack Stat.; re-en. Sec. 596, p. 157, Cod. Stat. 1871; amd. Sec. 25, p. 44, L. 1877; re-en. Sec. 25, 1st Div. Rev. Stat. 1879; re-en. Sec. 25, 1st Div. Comp. Stat. 1887; re-en. Sec. 590, C. Civ. Proc. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6497, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 9089, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. C. Civ. Proc. Sec. 388; re-en. Sec. 9089, R.C.M. 1935; R.C.M. 1947, 93-2827.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1983–2005 · leading case: Ioerger v. Reiner, 2005 MT 155 (Mont. 2005).
Ioerger v. Reiner, 2005 MT 155 (Mont. 2005). “That statute provides: When two or more persons associated in any business transact such business under a common name, whether it comprise the names of such persons or not, the associates may be sued by such common name, the summons in such cases being served on one or more of…”
Steinke v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 270 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (D. Mont. 2003). “Plaintiff relies on Mont.Code Ann. § 25-5-104 1 to connect these different Safeco entities and as a basis for Steinke’s standing against them.”
MacPheat v. Schauf, 2002 MT 23 (Mont. 2002). “¶15 Further, for purposes of designating FIGC as a named defendant, § 25-5-104, MCA, contains language strikingly similar in tone and effect to Oklahoma’s statute referenced above.”
Decker Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 714 P.2d 155 (Mont. 1986). “For instance, under Section 25-5-104, MCA, a partnership may be sued in its own name.”
Jerry Martin & Assocs., Inc. v. Don's Westland Bulk, 884 P.2d 795 (Mont. 1994). “Section 25-5-104, MCA, states: Action against a business association.”
Norick v. Dove Constr., 662 P.2d 1318 (Mont. 1983). “" Section 25-5-104, MCA. Substantively, there is a substantial question whether or not a partner has a right to sue the partnership.”
State v. Johnson, 660 P.2d 101 (Mont. 1983). “Section 25-5-104, MCA, prohibits the use or operation of slot machines.”
Gary Energy Corp. v. Metro Oil Prods., 114 F.R.D. 69 (D. Utah 1987). “Mont.Code Ann. § 25-5-104 states: When two or more persons associated in any business transact such business under a common name, whether it comprises the names of such persons or not, the associates may be sued by such common name, the summons in *71 such cases being served on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.