Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-443 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 35. CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND ASSOCIATIONS

CHAPTER 1. MONTANA BENEFIT CORPORATION ACT

Part 4. Directors and Officers (Renumbered and Repealed)

Repealed

35-1-443. Repealed. Secs. 269, 274, Ch. 271, L. 2019.

History: En. Sec. 96, Ch. 368, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 1262, Ch. 56, L. 2009.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2000–2015 · leading case: State v. Debus, 2002 MT 307 (Mont. 2002).
State v. Debus, 2002 MT 307 (Mont. 2002). · cites it 4× “He further alleges that he was authorized to rely upon Berry and Schramm's advice concerning the checks pursuant to § 35-1-443, MCA (1997). ¶ 23 Although Debus testified he was concerned his inability to pay child support would negatively affect Virtual, he produced no evidence…”
Knutson v. Bitterroot Int'l Sys., Inc., 2000 MT 203 (Mont. 2000). · cites it 2× “¶34 The correct legal standard, is set forth in § 35-1-443, MCA: (1) An officer with discretionary authority shall discharge his duties under that authority: (a) in good faith; (b) with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a similar position would exercise under similar…”
Meikle v. Olsen (In re Olsen), 522 B.R. 294 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2014). · cites it 3× “The legal standard of conduct for Olsen as an officer of a *320 business corporation in Montana is set forth in MCA § 35-1-443. 25 (1) An officer with discretionary authority shall discharge his duties under that authority: (a) in good faith; (b) with the care an ordinarily…”
Kulko v. Davail, Inc., 2015 MT 340 (Mont. 2015). · cites it 2× “We remand for reinstatement of the case, and direct the District Court to proceed to consider Kulko’s motion for leave to amend his complaint, as well as outstanding discovery matters, CHIEF JUSTICE McGRATH, JUSTICES SHEA, BAKER, WHEAT, McKINNON and RICE concur.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-443(1) — 1 case
Meikle v. Olsen (In re Olsen), 522 B.R. 294 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2014). “The legal standard of conduct for Olsen as an officer of a *320 business corporation in Montana is set forth in MCA § 35-1-443. 25 (1) An officer with discretionary authority shall discharge his duties under that authority: (a) in good faith; (b) with the care an ordinarily…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-443(2) — 1 case
Meikle v. Olsen (In re Olsen), 522 B.R. 294 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2014). “The legal standard of conduct for Olsen as an officer of a *320 business corporation in Montana is set forth in MCA § 35-1-443. 25 (1) An officer with discretionary authority shall discharge his duties under that authority: (a) in good faith; (b) with the care an ordinarily…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.