Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 39. LABOR · CHAPTER 71. WORKERS' COMPENSATION · Part 20. Rehabilitation Benefits (Renumbered)
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001 (2026)

Renumbered 39-71-1006

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 39
  3. CHAPTER 71
  4. Part 20
  5. 39-71-2001 Renumbered 39-71-1006

TITLE 39. LABOR

CHAPTER 71. WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Part 20. Rehabilitation Benefits (Renumbered)

Renumbered 39-71-1006

39-71-2001. Renumbered 39-71-1006. Code Commissioner, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1995–2018 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Cobbs v. Montana Dep't of Soc. & Rehab. Servs., 906 P.2d 204 (Mont. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Cobbs v. Montana Dep't of Soc. & Rehab. Servs., 906 P.2d 204 (Mont. 1995). · cites it 34× “The issue on appeal is: Does the State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services owe a clear legal duty to distribute funds from the Industrial Accident Rehabilitation Account when the Montana Department of Labor authorizes the distribution pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA…”
Reeves v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins., 911 P.2d 839 (Mont. 1996). · cites it 72× “The sole issue raised is whether Reeves is eligible for a rehabilitation plan pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA (1993). There- fore we do not address the important issue discussed in the concurring opinion.”
Loss v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 936 P.2d 313 (Mont. 1997). · cites it 16× “Subsequently, Loss requested total rehabilitation benefits pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA (1991). Lumbermens denied the request and Loss submitted a petition to the Workers' Compensation Court seeking total rehabilitation benefits.”
Murphy v. Westrock Co., 2018 MT 54 (Mont. 2018). “Section 39-71-116(30)(b), MCA (1993). Before the Workers' Compensation Court, WestRock conceded that, since 1993, chiropractors have been able to offer testimony as to a claimant's physical restrictions and ability to work in particular employments.”
Eastman v. Ins. Co. of North A, 2000 MT 216N (Mont. 2000). · cites it 9× “¶3 The sole issue on appeal is whether the Workers' Compensation Court erred in determining that Eastman was not entitled to 104 weeks of rehabilitation benefits for a two-year Major Appliance Repair and HVAC vo-tech program when the insurer did not formulate a rehabilitation…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001(1) — 2 cases
Reeves v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins., 911 P.2d 839 (Mont. 1996). “The sole issue raised is whether Reeves is eligible for a rehabilitation plan pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA (1993). There- fore we do not address the important issue discussed in the concurring opinion.”
Eastman v. Ins. Co. of North A, 2000 MT 216N (Mont. 2000). “¶3 The sole issue on appeal is whether the Workers' Compensation Court erred in determining that Eastman was not entitled to 104 weeks of rehabilitation benefits for a two-year Major Appliance Repair and HVAC vo-tech program when the insurer did not formulate a rehabilitation…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001(1)(b) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Cobbs v. Montana Dep't of Soc. & Rehab. Servs., 906 P.2d 204 (Mont. 1995). “The issue on appeal is: Does the State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services owe a clear legal duty to distribute funds from the Industrial Accident Rehabilitation Account when the Montana Department of Labor authorizes the distribution pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA…”
Murphy v. Westrock Co., 2018 MT 54 (Mont. 2018). “Section 39-71-116(30)(b), MCA (1993). Before the Workers' Compensation Court, WestRock conceded that, since 1993, chiropractors have been able to offer testimony as to a claimant's physical restrictions and ability to work in particular employments.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001(1)(c) — 1 case
Eastman v. Ins. Co. of North A, 2000 MT 216N (Mont. 2000). “¶3 The sole issue on appeal is whether the Workers' Compensation Court erred in determining that Eastman was not entitled to 104 weeks of rehabilitation benefits for a two-year Major Appliance Repair and HVAC vo-tech program when the insurer did not formulate a rehabilitation…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001(1)(d) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Cobbs v. Montana Dep't of Soc. & Rehab. Servs., 906 P.2d 204 (Mont. 1995). “The issue on appeal is: Does the State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services owe a clear legal duty to distribute funds from the Industrial Accident Rehabilitation Account when the Montana Department of Labor authorizes the distribution pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001(l) — 1 case
Reeves v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins., 911 P.2d 839 (Mont. 1996). “The sole issue raised is whether Reeves is eligible for a rehabilitation plan pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA (1993). There- fore we do not address the important issue discussed in the concurring opinion.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001(l)(b) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Cobbs v. Montana Dep't of Soc. & Rehab. Servs., 906 P.2d 204 (Mont. 1995). “The issue on appeal is: Does the State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services owe a clear legal duty to distribute funds from the Industrial Accident Rehabilitation Account when the Montana Department of Labor authorizes the distribution pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001(l)(c) — 1 case
Reeves v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins., 911 P.2d 839 (Mont. 1996). “The sole issue raised is whether Reeves is eligible for a rehabilitation plan pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA (1993). There- fore we do not address the important issue discussed in the concurring opinion.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-2001(l)(d) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Cobbs v. Montana Dep't of Soc. & Rehab. Servs., 906 P.2d 204 (Mont. 1995). “The issue on appeal is: Does the State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services owe a clear legal duty to distribute funds from the Industrial Accident Rehabilitation Account when the Montana Department of Labor authorizes the distribution pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA…”
Reeves v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins., 911 P.2d 839 (Mont. 1996). “The sole issue raised is whether Reeves is eligible for a rehabilitation plan pursuant to § 39-71-2001, MCA (1993). There- fore we do not address the important issue discussed in the concurring opinion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.