Notes of Decisions
In re Declaring T. Y. K. & D. A. W. R., 598 P.2d 593 (Mont. 1979).
· cites it 7× “The declared policy of Montana is found in section 41-3-101, MCA: “(a) insure that all youth are afforded an adequate physical and emotional environment to promote normal development; “(2) It is the policy of this state to provide for the protection of children whose health and…”
Prosser v. Kennedy Enter., Inc., 2008 MT 87 (Mont. 2008).
· cites it 4× “See § 41-3-101, MCA. Although State v. District Court and Newville do not discuss the public duty doctrine, they provide examples where the government, without question, owed a duty to a specific class of persons.”
In re C.A.R., 693 P.2d 1214 (Mont. 1984).
· cites it 5× “It states, in pertinent part: “(1) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the State of Montana to: “(a) insure that all youth are afforded an adequate physical and emotional environment to promote normal development; .”
In re C. R. O., 2002 MT 50 (Mont. 2002).
· cites it 4× “¶32 The Department ordinarily, and properly, makes serious efforts to meet this latter requirement by means of permitting a parent to complete a treatment plan and, often, a series of treatment plans. Under that approach, the Department proceeds with a petition to terminate…”
In re T.D.H., 2015 MT 244 (Mont. 2015).
· cites it 5× “t in her representation of the child thereafter agree, on that child’s behalf, that the proceedings may go *421 forward without representation for the child — especially when the child’s need for representation had remained unquestioned for over two years? How is the stated…”
Newville v. State, Dept. of Fam. Servs., 883 P.2d 793 (Mont. 1994).
· cites it 3× “” Section 41-3-101(2), MCA. We conclude that § 41-3-203, MCA, also does not immunize the Department from tort liability.”
Matter of A.B., YINC, 2020 MT 64 (Mont. 2020).
· cites it 2× “” Section 41-3-101(1)(a)-(b), MCA (emphasis added).”
J.L. v. Kienenberger, 848 P.2d 472 (Mont. 1993).
· cites it 6× “also cites Section 41-3-101, MCA, as evidence that parents have a moral and legal duty to provide for their children's physical, moral, and emotional well-being.”
In re T.E., 2002 MT 195 (Mont. 2002).
· cites it 2× “s why the children were not returned home when extending temporary legal custody as required in § 41-3-406(6), MCA (1997); (6) *153 hold the permanency plan hearing no later than twelve months after the initial order was issued pursuant to § 41-3-412, MCA (1997); and (7)…”
In re E.A.T., 1999 MT 281 (Mont. 1999).
· cites it 8× “¶31 While it is true that the State of Montana’s policy regarding child abuse and neglect is to preserve and protect family unity, it is also this state’s policy to provide for the protection of children whose health and welfare are or may be adversely affected and further…”
In re M.A.L., 2006 MT 299 (Mont. 2006).
· cites it 3× “Section 41-3-101, MCA (2003), states the policy of the state with regards to the welfare of children: (1) It is the policy of the state of Montana to: (a) provide for the protection of children whose health and welfare are or may be adversely affected and further threatened *446…”
In re B.S., 2009 MT 98 (Mont. 2009).
· cites it 3× “” ¶32 The father is correct that the best interests of the child are a critical factor in termination proceedings; the statutes give priority to the best interests of the child as the primary and paramount statutory standard for termination. Section 41-3-609(3), MCA, requires…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(1) — 6 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(1)(a) — 7 cases
Matter of A.B., YINC, 2020 MT 64 (Mont. 2020).
“” Section 41-3-101(1)(a)-(b), MCA (emphasis added).”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(1)(b) — 3 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(1)(d) — 10 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(1)(e) — 2 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(1)(f) — 2 cases
In re C. R. O., 2002 MT 50 (Mont. 2002).
“¶32 The Department ordinarily, and properly, makes serious efforts to meet this latter requirement by means of permitting a parent to complete a treatment plan and, often, a series of treatment plans. Under that approach, the Department proceeds with a petition to terminate…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(1)(i) — 1 case
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(2) — 5 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(3) — 6 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(4) — 16 cases
In re T.E., 2002 MT 195 (Mont. 2002).
“s why the children were not returned home when extending temporary legal custody as required in § 41-3-406(6), MCA (1997); (6) *153 hold the permanency plan hearing no later than twelve months after the initial order was issued pursuant to § 41-3-412, MCA (1997); and (7)…”
In re B.S., 2009 MT 98 (Mont. 2009).
“” ¶32 The father is correct that the best interests of the child are a critical factor in termination proceedings; the statutes give priority to the best interests of the child as the primary and paramount statutory standard for termination. Section 41-3-609(3), MCA, requires…”
In re E.A.T., 1999 MT 281 (Mont. 1999).
“¶31 While it is true that the State of Montana’s policy regarding child abuse and neglect is to preserve and protect family unity, it is also this state’s policy to provide for the protection of children whose health and welfare are or may be adversely affected and further…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(7) — 8 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(a) — 1 case
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(b) — 2 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(l)(a) — 6 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(l)(b) — 1 case
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(l)(d) — 5 cases
In re T.D.H., 2015 MT 244 (Mont. 2015).
“t in her representation of the child thereafter agree, on that child’s behalf, that the proceedings may go *421 forward without representation for the child — especially when the child’s need for representation had remained unquestioned for over two years? How is the stated…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-101(lXd) — 1 case
In re T.D.H., 2015 MT 244 (Mont. 2015).
“t in her representation of the child thereafter agree, on that child’s behalf, that the proceedings may go *421 forward without representation for the child — especially when the child’s need for representation had remained unquestioned for over two years? How is the stated…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.