Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-201 (2026)

Reports

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 41. MINORS

CHAPTER 3. CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT

Part 2. Reports and Investigations

Reports

41-3-201. Reports. (1) When the professionals and officials listed in subsection (2) know or have reasonable cause to suspect, as a result of information they receive in their professional or official capacity, that a child is abused or neglected by anyone regardless of whether the person suspected of causing the abuse or neglect is a parent or other person responsible for the child's welfare, they shall report the matter promptly to the department. The department shall follow the provisions of 41-3-212 in taking the report.

(2) Professionals and officials required to report are:

(a) a physician, resident, intern, or member of a hospital's staff engaged in the admission, examination, care, or treatment of persons;

(b) a nurse, osteopath, chiropractor, podiatrist, medical examiner, coroner, dentist, optometrist, or any other health or mental health professional;

(c) religious healers;

(d) school teachers, other school officials, and employees who work during regular school hours;

(e) a social worker licensed pursuant to Title 37, child protection investigator, child reunification specialist, operator or employee of any registered or licensed day-care or substitute care facility, staff of a resource and referral grant program organized under 52-2-711 or of a child and adult food care program, or an operator or employee of a child-care facility;

(f) a foster care, residential, or institutional worker;

(g) a peace officer or other law enforcement official;

(h) a member of the clergy, as defined in 15-6-201(2)(b);

(i) a guardian ad litem or a court-appointed advocate who is authorized to investigate a report of alleged abuse or neglect;

(j) an employee of an entity that contracts with the department to provide direct services to children; and

(k) an employee of the department while in conduct of the employee's duties.

(3) A professional listed in subsection (2)(a) or (2)(b) involved in the delivery or care of an infant shall report to the department any infant known to the professional to be affected by a dangerous drug, as defined in 50-32-101.

(4) Any person may make a report under this section if the person knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that a child is abused or neglected. The department shall follow the provisions of 41-3-212 when taking the report.

(5) (a) When a professional or official required to report under subsection (2) makes a report, the department:

(i) may share information with:

(A) that professional or official; or

(B) other individuals with whom the professional or official works in an official capacity if the individuals are part of a team that responds to matters involving the child or the person about whom the report was made and the professional or official has asked that the information be shared with the individuals; and

(ii) shall share information with the individuals listed in subsections (5)(a)(i)(A) and (5)(a)(i)(B) on specific request. Information shared pursuant to this subsection (5)(a)(ii) may be limited to the outcome of the investigation and any subsequent action that will be taken on behalf of the child who is the subject of the report.

(b) The department may provide information in accordance with 41-3-202(8) and also share information about the investigation, limited to its outcome and any subsequent action that will be taken on behalf of the child who is the subject of the report.

(c) Individuals who receive information pursuant to this subsection (5) shall maintain the confidentiality of the information as required by 41-3-205.

(6) (a) Except as provided in subsection (6)(b) or (6)(c), a person listed in subsection (2) may not refuse to make a report as required in this section on the grounds of a physician-patient or similar privilege.

(b) A member of the clergy or a priest is not required to make a report under this section if:

(i) the knowledge or suspicion of the abuse or neglect came from a statement or confession made to the member of the clergy or the priest in that person's capacity as a member of the clergy or as a priest;

(ii) the statement was intended to be a part of a confidential communication between the member of the clergy or the priest and a member of the church or congregation; and

(iii) the person who made the statement or confession does not consent to the disclosure by the member of the clergy or the priest.

(c) A member of the clergy or a priest is not required to make a report under this section if the communication is required to be confidential by canon law, church doctrine, or established church practice.

(7) The reports referred to under this section must contain:

(a) the names and addresses of the child and the child's parents or other persons responsible for the child's care;

(b) to the extent known, the child's age and the nature and extent of the child's injuries, including any evidence of previous injuries;

(c) any other information that the maker of the report believes might be helpful in establishing the cause of the injuries or showing the willful neglect and the identity of the person or persons responsible for the injury or neglect; and

(d) the facts that led the person reporting to believe that the child has suffered injury or injuries or willful neglect, within the meaning of this chapter.

History: En. Sec. 2, Ch. 178, L. 1965; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 292, L. 1973; Sec. 10-902, R.C.M. 1947; redes. 10-1304 by Sec. 14, Ch. 328, L. 1974; R.C.M. 1947, 10-1304; amd. Sec. 6, Ch. 543, L. 1979; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 511, L. 1981; amd. Sec. 11, Ch. 609, L. 1987; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 79, L. 1989; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 785, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 458, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 162, Ch. 546, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 514, L. 1997; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 311, L. 2001; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 382, L. 2005; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 166, L. 2007; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 223, L. 2011; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 278, L. 2011; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 337, L. 2013; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 235, L. 2017; amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 367, L. 2019; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 216, L. 2021; amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 520, L. 2021; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 382, L. 2023; amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 153, L. 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Gross v. Myers, 748 P.2d 459 (Mont. 1987).
Gross v. Myers, 748 P.2d 459 (Mont. 1987). · cites it 51× “While § 41-3-201, MCA, contains the reporting requirement for a professional such as Ms.”
State v. Kirk Spencer, 2007 MT 245 (Mont. 2007). · cites it 8× “Section 41-3-201, MCA. Spencer further asserts that law enforcement waited for and completely relied on results from Ms.”
Newville v. State, Dept. of Fam. Servs., 883 P.2d 793 (Mont. 1994). · cites it 6× “This is a matter of interpreting § 41-3-201, MCA, which provides in pertinent part: (1) When the professionals and officials listed in subsection (2) know or have reasonable cause to suspect, as a result of information they receive in their professional or official capacity,…”
Planned Parenthood v. State, 2024 MT 178 (Mont. 2024). · cites it 3× “Section 41-3-201, MCA. A provider’s violation of the mandatory reporting law can result in civil liability and criminal sanctions of up to five years in prison and $10,000 in fines.”
Kulstad v. Maniaci, 2010 MT 248 (Mont. 2010). · cites it 2× “”This concern is neither an actual report of psychological abuse under §41-3-201, MCA, nor an investigation or a determination of abuse under § 41-3-202, MCA.”
Seely v. State, 282 S.W.3d 778 (Ark. 2008). “§ 41-3-201 ] also requires reporting by physicians, residents, interns, and other hospital staff; nurses, osteopaths, chiropractors, podiatrists, medical examiners, coroners, dentists, optometrists, and other health or mental health professionals; religious healers; school…”
In Re a. W-m., 1998 MT 157 (Mont. 1998). · cites it 2× “argues, “the child should not have been removed and the action should have been terminated.”
Brown v. Montana, 442 F. Supp. 2d 982 (D. Mont. 2006). “*998 § 41-3-201(1), (2) (1985). Noting that “[t]he purpose of the statutory requirement for the report of child abuse is to allow qualified persons .”
Wicklund v. Lambert, 979 F. Supp. 1285 (D. Mont. 1997). “§ 50-20-212(2)(b), § 41-3-201(1). Plaintiffs argue that this process will necessarily provide constructive notice to the parents of an abused minor.”
Watchtower v. 20th Jud. Dist., 2021 MT 13 (Mont. 2021). · cites it 4× “¶13 Further, nothing in the colloquy between the District Court and counsel before trial prevented the District Court from allowing Nunez to amend her claims later.”
R.L.S. v. Barkhoff, 674 P.2d 1082 (Mont. 1983). · cites it 2× “This order is made pursuant to Section 41-3-201 et seq., MCA, and is to remain in effect for one year from the date of its entry by the District Court, unless that court deems an extension necessary.”
Rodgers (D. Mont. 2026). · cites it 19× “) Rodgers argues that Valley County and Strommen had obligations promptly to report Strommen’s sexual abuse of Rodgers to the Department of Health and Human services pursuant to Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-201 (1) and (2)(g).”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-201(1) — 3 cases
Gross v. Myers, 748 P.2d 459 (Mont. 1987). “While § 41-3-201, MCA, contains the reporting requirement for a professional such as Ms.”
Brown v. Montana, 442 F. Supp. 2d 982 (D. Mont. 2006). “*998 § 41-3-201(1), (2) (1985). Noting that “[t]he purpose of the statutory requirement for the report of child abuse is to allow qualified persons .”
Wicklund v. Lambert, 979 F. Supp. 1285 (D. Mont. 1997). “§ 50-20-212(2)(b), § 41-3-201(1). Plaintiffs argue that this process will necessarily provide constructive notice to the parents of an abused minor.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-201(2) — 1 case
Gross v. Myers, 748 P.2d 459 (Mont. 1987). “While § 41-3-201, MCA, contains the reporting requirement for a professional such as Ms.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-201(6)(b) — 2 cases
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-201(f) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.