Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-202 (2026)

Action On Reporting

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 41. MINORS

CHAPTER 3. CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT

Part 2. Reports and Investigations

Action On Reporting

41-3-202. Action on reporting. (1) (a) Upon receipt of a report that a child is or has been abused or neglected, the department shall promptly assess the information contained in the report and make a determination regarding the level of response required and the timeframe within which action must be initiated.

(b) (i) Except as provided in subsections (1)(b)(ii) and (1)(b)(iii), upon receipt of a report that includes an allegation of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation when the alleged perpetrator of the sexual abuse or sexual exploitation was 12 years of age or older or if the department determines during any investigation that the circumstances surrounding an allegation of child abuse or neglect include an allegation of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation when the alleged perpetrator of the sexual abuse or sexual exploitation was 12 years of age or older, the department shall immediately report the allegation to the county attorney of the county in which the acts that are the subject of the report occurred.

(ii) If a victim of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation has attained the age of 14 and has sought services from a contractor as described in 41-3-201(2)(j) that provides confidential services to victims of sexual assault, conditioned upon an understanding that the criminal conduct will not be reported by the department to the county attorney in the jurisdiction in which the alleged crime occurred, the department may not report pursuant to 41-3-205(5)(d) and subsection (1)(b)(i) of this section.

(iii) If the department or law enforcement determines that the allegation involves the county attorney or an employee in the county attorney's office in the county in which the acts that are subject to reporting occurred, the department or law enforcement shall report as required in subsection (1)(b)(i) to the attorney general.

(c) If the department determines that an investigation and a safety and risk assessment are required, a child protection investigator shall promptly conduct a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the allegations of abuse or neglect of the child and perform a safety and risk assessment to determine whether the living arrangement presents an unsafe environment for the child. The safety and risk assessment may include an investigation at the home of the child involved, the child's school or day-care facility, or any other place where the child is present and into all other nonfinancial matters that in the discretion of the investigator are relevant to the safety and risk assessment. In conducting a safety and risk assessment under this section, a child protection investigator may not inquire into the financial status of the child's family or of any other person responsible for the child's care, except as necessary to ascertain eligibility for state or federal assistance programs or to comply with the provisions of 41-3-446.

(2) An initial investigation of alleged abuse or neglect may be conducted when an anonymous report is received. However, if the initial investigation does not within 48 hours result in the development of independent, corroborative, and attributable information indicating that there exists a current risk of physical or psychological harm to the child, a child may not be removed from the living arrangement. If independent, corroborative, and attributable information indicating an ongoing risk results from the initial investigation, the department shall then conduct a safety and risk assessment.

(3) The child protection investigator is responsible for conducting the safety and risk assessment. If the child is treated at a medical facility, the child protection investigator, county attorney, or peace officer, consistent with reasonable medical practice, has the right of access to the child for interviews, photographs, and securing physical evidence and has the right of access to relevant hospital and medical records pertaining to the child. If an interview of the child is considered necessary, the child protection investigator, county attorney, or peace officer may conduct an interview of the child. The interview may be conducted in the presence of the parent or guardian or an employee of the school or day-care facility attended by the child.

(4) Subject to 41-3-205(3), if the child's interview is audiotaped or videotaped, an unedited audiotape or videotape with audio track must be made available, upon request, for unencumbered review by the family.

(5) (a) If from the safety and risk assessment the department has reasonable cause to suspect that the child is suffering abuse or neglect, the department may provide emergency protective services to the child, pursuant to 41-3-301, or enter into a written prevention plan, pursuant to 41-3-302, and may provide protective services to any other child under the same care. The department shall:

(i) after interviewing the parent or guardian, if reasonably available, document the determinations of the safety and risk assessment; and

(ii) notify the child's family of the determinations of the safety and risk assessment, unless the notification can reasonably be expected to result in harm to the child or other person.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (5)(c), the department shall destroy all safety and risk assessment determinations and associated records, except for medical records, within 30 days after the end of the 3-year period starting from the date of completion of the safety and risk assessment.

(c) Safety and risk assessment determinations and associated records may be maintained for a reasonable time as defined by department rule under the following circumstances:

(i) the safety and risk assessment determines that abuse or neglect occurred;

(ii) there had been a previous or there is a subsequent report and investigation resulting in a safety and risk assessment concerning the same person; or

(iii) an order has been issued by a court of competent jurisdiction adjudicating the child as a youth in need of care based on the circumstances surrounding the initial allegations.

(6) The investigating child protection investigator, within 60 days of commencing an investigation, shall also furnish a written safety and risk assessment to the department and, on request, to the family. Subject to time periods set forth in subsections (5)(b) and (5)(c), the department shall maintain a record system documenting investigations and safety and risk assessment determinations. Unless records are required to be destroyed under subsections (5)(b) and (5)(c), the department shall retain records relating to the safety and risk assessment, including case notes, correspondence, evaluations, videotapes, and interviews, for 25 years.

(7) Any person reporting abuse or neglect that involves acts or omissions on the part of a public or private residential institution, home, facility, or agency is responsible for ensuring that the report is made to the department.

(8) The department shall, upon request from any reporter of alleged child abuse or neglect, verify whether the report has been received, describe the level of response and timeframe for action that the department has assigned to the report, and confirm that it is being acted upon.

History: En. Sec. 3, Ch. 178, L. 1965; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 292, L. 1973; Sec. 10-903, R.C.M. 1947; redes. 10-1305 by Sec. 14, Ch. 328, L. 1974; R.C.M. 1947, 10-1305; amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 543, L. 1979; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 567, L. 1979; amd. Sec. 11, Ch. 609, L. 1987; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 126, L. 1989; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 329, L. 1993; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 146, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 163, Ch. 546, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 564, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 514, L. 1997; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 516, L. 1997; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 566, L. 1999; amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 311, L. 2001; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 406, L. 2003; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 555, L. 2003; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 382, L. 2005; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 61, L. 2013; amd. Secs. 6, 14, Ch. 367, L. 2019; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 382, L. 2019; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 19, L. 2021; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 364, L. 2021; amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 520, L. 2021; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 195, L. 2023; amd. Sec. 9, Ch. 153, L. 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Riggs v. State, 2011 MT 239 (Mont. 2011).
Riggs v. State, 2011 MT 239 (Mont. 2011). · cites it 28× “2d 455, 459 (1990), and 2) by operation of § 41-3-202(5)(b), MCA. The State argues that the statements were not bad character evidence and that § 41-3-202(5)(b), MCA, has no application in this case.”
In re D.B., 2004 MT 371 (Mont. 2004). · cites it 5× “By seeking out those California reports and transferring them to Dr. Peterson, Mother asserts the Department violated the spirit of that Montana statute and prejudiced Dr.”
Matter of D.B., 2004 MT 371 (Mont. 2004). · cites it 5× “11 ¶37 Section 41-3-202(5)(c), MCA (2003), was enacted in 2003–after the commencement of this action and after the District Court’s decision that Dr.”
Kulstad v. Maniaci, 2010 MT 248 (Mont. 2010). · cites it 2× “”This concern is neither an actual report of psychological abuse under §41-3-201, MCA, nor an investigation or a determination of abuse under § 41-3-202, MCA. Antonioli testified: T don’t believe I have ever said that [Maniaci] is abusing the children.”
Newville v. State, Dept. of Fam. Servs., 883 P.2d 793 (Mont. 1994). “See § 41-3-1103(b) and (d), MCA; § 41-3-1142, MCA; and § 41-3-202(1) and (2), MCA. We conclude the Department, at all times leading up to the tort sued upon in this case, was acting ministerially.”
In re D.T.H., 2001 MT 138 (Mont. 2001). · cites it 2× “Section 41-3-202(1) and (2), MCA. Following removal of a child from his home, if the Department wishes temporary investigative authority, it must file a petition supported by an affidavit or department report stating in detail the facts upon which the request is based.”
Matter of J.D., YINC, 2025 MT 274 (Mont. 2025). · cites it 6× “” Section 41-3-202(c), MCA. A safety and risk assessment requires a CPS to assess “(a) the existing threat or threats to the child’s safety; (b) the protective capabilities of the parent or guardian; (c) any particular vulnerabilities of the child; (d) any interventions required…”
Weber v. State, 2015 MT 161 (Mont. 2015). · cites it 2× “See § 41-3-202(1), MCA (requiring the Department to “promptly assess” a report of child abuse or neglect, and directing a "thorough investigation” of all “nonfinandal matters that in the discretion of the investigator are relevant to the investigation” (emphasis added)).”
In re Inquiry of S.L.T., 697 P.2d 472 (Mont. 1985). · cites it 3× “Section 41-3-202, MCA requires than an investigation be conducted by the county attorney, a peace officer or a social worker upon receipt of a report of abuse or neglect.”
Matter of D.T.H., 2001 MT 138 (Mont. 2001). · cites it 2× “Section 41-3-202(1) and (2), MCA. Following removal of a file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-282%20Opinion.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-202(1) — 4 cases
Newville v. State, Dept. of Fam. Servs., 883 P.2d 793 (Mont. 1994). “See § 41-3-1103(b) and (d), MCA; § 41-3-1142, MCA; and § 41-3-202(1) and (2), MCA. We conclude the Department, at all times leading up to the tort sued upon in this case, was acting ministerially.”
In re D.T.H., 2001 MT 138 (Mont. 2001). “Section 41-3-202(1) and (2), MCA. Following removal of a child from his home, if the Department wishes temporary investigative authority, it must file a petition supported by an affidavit or department report stating in detail the facts upon which the request is based.”
Weber v. State, 2015 MT 161 (Mont. 2015). “See § 41-3-202(1), MCA (requiring the Department to “promptly assess” a report of child abuse or neglect, and directing a "thorough investigation” of all “nonfinandal matters that in the discretion of the investigator are relevant to the investigation” (emphasis added)).”
Matter of D.T.H., 2001 MT 138 (Mont. 2001). “Section 41-3-202(1) and (2), MCA. Following removal of a file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-282%20Opinion.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-202(5)(b) — 1 case
Riggs v. State, 2011 MT 239 (Mont. 2011). “2d 455, 459 (1990), and 2) by operation of § 41-3-202(5)(b), MCA. The State argues that the statements were not bad character evidence and that § 41-3-202(5)(b), MCA, has no application in this case.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-202(5)(c) — 2 cases
In re D.B., 2004 MT 371 (Mont. 2004). “By seeking out those California reports and transferring them to Dr. Peterson, Mother asserts the Department violated the spirit of that Montana statute and prejudiced Dr.”
Matter of D.B., 2004 MT 371 (Mont. 2004). “11 ¶37 Section 41-3-202(5)(c), MCA (2003), was enacted in 2003–after the commencement of this action and after the District Court’s decision that Dr.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-202(5)(c)(i) — 1 case
Riggs v. State, 2011 MT 239 (Mont. 2011). “2d 455, 459 (1990), and 2) by operation of § 41-3-202(5)(b), MCA. The State argues that the statements were not bad character evidence and that § 41-3-202(5)(b), MCA, has no application in this case.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-202(5)(c)(i)(A) — 2 cases
In re D.B., 2004 MT 371 (Mont. 2004). “By seeking out those California reports and transferring them to Dr. Peterson, Mother asserts the Department violated the spirit of that Montana statute and prejudiced Dr.”
Matter of D.B., 2004 MT 371 (Mont. 2004). “11 ¶37 Section 41-3-202(5)(c), MCA (2003), was enacted in 2003–after the commencement of this action and after the District Court’s decision that Dr.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-202(c) — 1 case
Matter of J.D., YINC, 2025 MT 274 (Mont. 2025). “” Section 41-3-202(c), MCA. A safety and risk assessment requires a CPS to assess “(a) the existing threat or threats to the child’s safety; (b) the protective capabilities of the parent or guardian; (c) any particular vulnerabilities of the child; (d) any interventions required…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.