45-2-303. Separate conviction of person accountable. A person who is legally accountable for the conduct of another that is an element of an offense may be convicted upon proof that the offense was committed and that the person was accountable although the other person claimed to have committed the offense has not been prosecuted or convicted, has been convicted of a different offense, is not amenable to justice, or has been acquitted.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 45-2-303 (2026)
Separate Conviction Of Person Accountable
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 45. CRIMES
CHAPTER 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LIABILITY
Part 3. Liability for Acts Committed by or for Another
Separate Conviction Of Person Accountable
History: En. 94-2-108 by Sec. 1, Ch. 513, L. 1973; R.C.M. 1947, 94-2-108; amd. Sec. 1641, Ch. 56, L. 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case: State v. Doyle, 2007 MT 125 (Mont. 2007).
State v. Doyle, 2007 MT 125 (Mont. 2007). “¶60 Section 45-2-303, MCA, provides, and we have long held, that a person may be “convicted for accountability on proof that the offense was committed, even though the other person claimed to have committed the offense has not been convicted or is convicted of a different crime.”
Fitzpatrick v. State, 638 P.2d 1002 (Mont. 1981). “Although the aiding and abetting statutes treats both situations the same insofar as criminal accountability is concerned (§ 45-2-302 and § 45-2-303, MCA), the verdict returned by the jury does not reveal whether the jury found Fitzpatrick to be a direct principal or an aider or…”
State v. Gibbs, 797 P.2d 928 (Mont. 1990). “Section 45-2-303, MCA. There is stronger proof in Rebecca’s case that she aided or abetted “trafficking,” since for a consideration to her husband, she tanned two hides for Burke.”
State v. D. Wood, 2024 MT 318 (Mont. 2024). “commission of the [subject] offense”—emphasis added); § 45-2-303, MCA (a person “may be convicted” of being “legally accountable for the conduct of another” on “proof that the offense was committed” even if “the other person [alleged] to have committed the offense has not been…”
State v. Stark, 2017 MT 7N (Mont. 2017). “See § 45-2-303, MCA (providing that a person may be convicted of legal accountability for the conduct of another “upon proof that the offense was committed and that the person was accountable although the other person claimed to have committed the offense has not been prosecuted…”
State v. Med. Top, 2003 MT 286N (Mont. 2003). “Section 45-2-303, MCA, provides for a separate conviction of a person accountable and states that a person who is legally accountable for the conduct of another which is an element of an offense may be convicted upon proof that the offense was committed and that he was so…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.