Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 23. PROBATION, PAROLE, AND CLEMENCY · Part 4. Supervised Release Program (Repealed)
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-401 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 46
  3. CHAPTER 23
  4. Part 4
  5. 46-23-401 Repealed

TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CHAPTER 23. PROBATION, PAROLE, AND CLEMENCY

Part 4. Supervised Release Program (Repealed)

Repealed

46-23-401. Repealed. Sec. 15, Ch. 322, L. 1997.

History: En. Sec. 2, Ch. 288, L. 1969; amd. Sec. 92, Ch. 120, L. 1974; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 496, L. 1975; R.C.M. 1947, 95-2218; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 583, L. 1981; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 262, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 230, Ch. 546, L. 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–1999 · leading case: Lopez v. Great Falls Pre-Release Servs., Inc., 1999 MT 199 (Mont. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lopez v. Great Falls Pre-Release Servs., Inc., 1999 MT 199 (Mont. 1999). · cites it 4× “¶19 The Center contends that it owed Lopez no duty because the DOC did not “delegate jurisdictional supervision” to the Center under statutes governing the State’s supervised release program which were in effect at the time of the alleged negligence.”
State v. Roberts, 912 P.2d 812 (Mont. 1996). · cites it 3× “*368 The only “supervised release program” addressed by statute in Montana is codified in §§ 46-23-401 through 46-23-426, MCA. The legislature did not define with any specificity in these statutes the supervised release program it contemplated.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-401(5) — 1 case
Lopez v. Great Falls Pre-Release Servs., Inc., 1999 MT 199 (Mont. 1999). “¶19 The Center contends that it owed Lopez no duty because the DOC did not “delegate jurisdictional supervision” to the Center under statutes governing the State’s supervised release program which were in effect at the time of the alleged negligence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.