46-8-201. Repealed. Secs. 74, 80(2), Ch. 449, L. 2005.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-8-201 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 8. RIGHT TO COUNSEL
Part 2. Compensation of Assigned Counsel (Repealed)
Repealed
History: En. 95-1005 by Sec. 1, Ch. 196, L. 1967; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 186, L. 1973; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 15, L. 1974; amd. Sec. 9, Ch. 184, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 95-1005; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 218, L. 1979; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 295, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 10, Ch. 680, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 1, Sp. L. 1985; amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 704, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 70, Ch. 800, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 9, Ch. 262, L. 1993; amd. Sec. 40, Ch. 585, L. 2001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1979–2004 · leading case: Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985).
Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). “1984); Mont. Code Ann. § 46-8-201 (1983); State v.”
State v. Yarns, 826 P.2d 543 (Mont. 1992). “II Did the District Court err in ordering the fees of appointed defense counsel to be paid by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks? In its order dismissing the State's appeal and remanding the case to the Justice Court, the District Court cited § 46-8-201, MCA…”
State v. Allies, 597 P.2d 64 (Mont. 1979). “1947, now section 46-8-201 MCA, states: *325 “Renumeration of appointed counsel.”
State v. Boyken, 637 P.2d 1193 (Mont. 1981). “To determine whether the District Court abused its discretion in limiting Bottomly’s fees to $1,000 it is necessary to refer to section 46-8-201(1), MCA. It provides: “Whenever in a criminal proceeding an attorney represents or defends any person by order of the court on the…”
State v. McKenzie, 608 P.2d 425 (Mont. 1979). “The pertinent statute involved in this issue is section 46-8-201 (1), MCA: “Remuneration of appointed counsel.”
In re N.V., 2004 MT 80 (Mont. 2004). “argues that, pursuant to the remuneration of appointed counsel statute, § 46-8-201, MCA, his counsel is entitled to receive reimbursement for the reasonable costs of travel to visit him at Pine Hills.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-8-201(1) — 1 case
State v. Boyken, 637 P.2d 1193 (Mont. 1981). “To determine whether the District Court abused its discretion in limiting Bottomly’s fees to $1,000 it is necessary to refer to section 46-8-201(1), MCA. It provides: “Whenever in a criminal proceeding an attorney represents or defends any person by order of the court on the…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-8-201(2)(b) — 1 case
State v. Yarns, 826 P.2d 543 (Mont. 1992). “II Did the District Court err in ordering the fees of appointed defense counsel to be paid by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks? In its order dismissing the State's appeal and remanding the case to the Justice Court, the District Court cited § 46-8-201, MCA…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.