Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 61-8-733 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 61. MOTOR VEHICLES

CHAPTER 8. TRAFFIC REGULATION

Part 7. Enforcement -- Penalties

Repealed

61-8-733. Repealed. Sec. 44, Ch. 498, L. 2021.

History: En. Sec. 10, Ch. 525, L. 1997; amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 300, L. 2003; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 583, L. 2005; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 448, L. 2009; amd. Sec. 23, Ch. 153, L. 2013; amd. Sec. 9, Ch. 309, L. 2013; amd. Sec. 18, Ch. 424, L. 2015.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2001–2010 · leading case: City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156, 622 N.W.2d 364 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156, 622 N.W.2d 364 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). “Mont.Code Ann. § 61-8-733(1) (1999). Finally, in South Carolina [i]n addition to the penalties for a person convicted of a * ⅜ * third or subsequent violation within the last ten years of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor * * * the person…”
Matter of Courts of Ltd. Jurisdi (Mont. 2010). · cites it 8× “(§ 61-8-421 and § 61-8-733) (§ 61-8-442 and § 61-8-733) • Deferred of imposition of sentence not • Deferred of imposition of sentence not allowed.”
State v. Herman, 2005 MT 92N (Mont. 2005). · cites it 5× “¶2 Section 61-8-733, MCA, authorizes a district court to require a defendant, who is guilty of a second-offense driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI), to forfeit his vehicle.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 61-8-733(1) — 1 case
City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156, 622 N.W.2d 364 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). “Mont.Code Ann. § 61-8-733(1) (1999). Finally, in South Carolina [i]n addition to the penalties for a person convicted of a * ⅜ * third or subsequent violation within the last ten years of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor * * * the person…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.