Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 13
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 13-901 to 13-928 shall be known and may be cited as the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 188 cases (40 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Est. of McElwee v. Omaha Transit Auth., 664 N.W.2d 461 (Neb. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Est. of McElwee v. Omaha Transit Auth., 664 N.W.2d 461 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 8× “NATURE OF CASE The Omaha Transit Authority, doing business as Metro Area Transit, and Kathryn Waltrip (collectively MAT) appeal from a judgment entered against them pursuant to the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act (the Act), Neb.Rev.Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1997).”
Phillips v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 876 N.W.2d 361 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 4× “A neg- ligence action brought under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 2012), has the same - 124 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 293 Nebraska R eports PHILLIPS v.”
Patterson v. Metro. Util. Dist., 302 Neb. 442 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, we conclude Patterson's petition was filed outside of the timing requirements of § 13-919(1).”
Reiber v. Cnty. of Gage, 303 Neb. 325 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “Gesin's mother Rhonda Reiber, the special administrator of Gesin's estate, brought this negligence action against the County of Gage, Nebraska, the Gage County sheriff, and unknown Gage County sheriff's employees under the Nebraska Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act (PSTCA),…”
Lamb v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 36, 293 Neb. 138 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “12 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 2012).”
Parsons v. McCann, 138 F. Supp. 3d 1086 (D. Neb. 2015). · cites it 6× “Finally, Douglas County contends that Plaintiffs’ state-law claim for abuse of process must be dismissed because Plaintiffs do not allege -that they submitted a written notice of claim to Douglas County, a condition precedent to filing suit under the Political Subdivisions Tort…”
Millman v. Cnty. of Butler, 458 N.W.2d 207 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 6× “1987), to chapter 13, article 9, of the Revised Statutes of Nebraska (Reissue 1987), namely, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 13-901 to 13-926 (Reissue 1987).”
Christianson v. Educ. Serv. Unit No. 16, 501 N.W.2d 281 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 6× “pursuant to the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1991).”
Aw v. Lancaster Cnty. Sch. Dist. 0001, 784 N.W.2d 907 (Neb. 2010). · cites it 2× “was a foreseeable consequence of LPS' failure to initially note Siems' entry into the school or to carefully monitor Siems, and C.B., after it was determined that Siems had entered the school.”
State ex rel. Unger v. State, 878 N.W.2d 540 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “2 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-901 to 13-928 (Reissue 2012).”
Heins v. Webster Cnty., 552 N.W.2d 51 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 4× “Heins brought this action under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb.Rev. Stat. §§ 13-901 through 13-926 (Reissue 1991 & Cum.”
Edwards v. Douglas Cnty., 308 Neb. 259 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 3× “Once inside, Edwards saw that Jason 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-901 to 13-928 (Reissue 2012).”
Show all 188 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901(2) — 1 case
Edwards v. Douglas Cnty., 308 Neb. 259 (Neb. 2021). “Once inside, Edwards saw that Jason 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-901 to 13-928 (Reissue 2012).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901(7) — 1 case
Roebuck v. North Platte Pub. Sch. Dist., 34 Neb. Ct. App. 116 (Neb. Ct. App. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.