Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-405 (2026)

Building zones; boundaries; regulations; change or repeal; protest

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Regulations, restrictions, and boundaries adopted pursuant to sections 14-401 to 14-418 may from time to time be amended, supplemented, changed, modified, or repealed. When a protest against a change of boundaries is presented to the city clerk at least six days prior to the city council vote on such change and such change is not in accordance with the comprehensive development plan, such change shall not become effective except by a favorable vote of five-sevenths of all members of the city council. Such protest shall be in writing, signed, and sworn and acknowledged pursuant to section 64-206 by the required owners. For purposes of this section, the required owners means those fee simple owners of record as recorded by the county register of deeds owning at least twenty percent of the area: (1) Included in the proposed change; (2) abutting either side of the proposed change; (3) abutting the rear of the proposed change; (4) abutting the front of the proposed change; or (5) directly opposite of the proposed change on the other side of a dedicated public right-of-way and extending fifty feet on either side of such opposite lot.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1989–1999 · leading case: Nelson v. City of Omaha, 589 N.W.2d 522 (Neb. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nelson v. City of Omaha, 589 N.W.2d 522 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 16× “On June 25, 1997, certain Plaintiffs filed a Formal Protest, with the City Clerk for the City of Omaha, to the Major Amendment to a Planned Unit Development Overlay District, pursuant to Omaha Code §55-590(1) and Neb.Rev.Stat. §14-405, and which protest would require the City…”

Giger v. City of Omaha, 442 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 1989). “§ 14-405. Further, § 14-403 in part provides: Whenever the City council shall determine that the use or contemplated use of any building, structure or land will cause congestion in the streets, increase danger from fire or panic, imperil public safety, cause undue concentration…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.