Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 14
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-413 (2026)

Zoning board of appeals; decision; review by district court; procedure

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person or persons, jointly or severally aggrieved by any decision of the zoning board of appeals, or any officer, department, board, or bureau of a city of the metropolitan class, may present to the district court a petition, duly verified, setting forth that such decision is illegal, in whole or in part, and specifying the grounds of such illegality. Such petition must be presented to the court within thirty days after the filing of the decision in the office of the zoning board of appeals.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1950–2025 · leading case: McEwen v. Nebraska State Coll. Sys., 303 Neb. 552 (Neb. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McEwen v. Nebraska State Coll. Sys., 303 Neb. 552 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 3× “The plaintiff appealed an Omaha Zoning Board of Appeals decision, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-413 (Reissue 1997). The district court affirmed the board's decision.”
Kuhlmann v. City of Omaha, 556 N.W.2d 15 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 10× “Upon the failure of the Board to renew the waiver, Kuhlmann filed a petition in Douglas County District Court pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-413 (Reissue 1991) for review of the Board’s decision.”
Goodman v. City of Omaha, 742 N.W.2d 26 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 4× “Decisions of the zoning board of appeals are reviewable by a district court pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 14-413 and 14-414 (Reissue 1997).”
Bruning v. City of Omaha Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 303 Neb. 146 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “The Brunings appealed the decision to the district court for Douglas County under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-413 (Reissue 2012). On February 5, 2018, the district court found that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the decision and affirmed the Board's denial.”
Rousseau v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Omaha, 764 N.W.2d 130 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 14-413 (Reissue 2007) provides for an appeal from the Board's decision to the district court on the ground that the decision is illegal, and states in pertinent part as follows: Any person or persons .”
Kay v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 504 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2007). “§ 76-2-327 (30 days); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 14-413 (30 days); Nev. Rev.”
Roncka v. Fogarty, 41 N.W.2d 745 (Neb. 1950). · cites it 4× “Section 14-413 provides that any person or persons, jointly or severally aggrieved by any decision of the board of appeals may present to the district court a petition, duly verified, setting forth that such decision is illegal, in whole or in part, specifying the grounds of…”
McClelland v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 441 N.W.2d 893 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “The McClellands appealed to the Douglas County District Court, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 14-413 and 14-414 (Reissue 1987).”
Morello v. City of Omaha Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 565 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 7× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-413 (Reissue 1991), Morello filed a petition for review with the Douglas County District Court.”
Eastroads, L.L.C. v. Omaha Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 587 N.W.2d 413 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 14-413 and 14-414 (Reissue 1997), Eastroads filed a petition on appeal in the district court, alleging the action of the Zoning Board’s decision was unsup *953 ported by the evidence; was inequitable and contrary to law; was based in whole or in…”
Morello v. City of Omaha Zoning Bd., 565 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 7× “Pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 14-413 (Reissue 1991), Morello filed a petition for review with the Douglas County District Court.”
French v. City of Omaha Zoning Bd. (Neb. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-413 (Reissue 2022) provides for an appeal from the Board’s decision to the district court on the ground that the decision is illegal.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.