The Nebraska State Fair Support and Improvement Cash Fund is created. The fund shall be maintained in the state accounting system as a cash fund. The State Treasurer shall credit to the fund the disbursement of state lottery proceeds designated for the Nebraska State Fair and matching funds from the most populous city within the county in which the state fair is located. The balance of any fund that is administratively created to receive lottery proceeds designated for the Nebraska State Fair and matching fund revenue prior to May 25, 2005, shall be transferred to the Nebraska State Fair Support and Improvement Cash Fund on such date. The Nebraska State Fair Support and Improvement Cash Fund shall be expended by the Nebraska State Fair Board to provide support for operating expenses and capital facility enhancements, including new construction and other capital improvements and other enhancements to and upon any exhibition facility utilized as the location of the Nebraska State Fair. Expenditures from the fund shall not be limited to the amount appropriated. Any money in the fund available for investment shall be invested by the state investment officer pursuant to the Nebraska Capital Expansion Act and the Nebraska State Funds Investment Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 2008–2016 · leading case:
State v. Schnell, 757 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Schnell, 757 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 7× “See § 2-108(A). Thus, the Supreme Court has long held that as a general rule, an appellant may dismiss his or her appeal without the consent of the appellee.”
Nichols v. Fairway Bldg. Prods., 884 N.W.2d 124 (Neb. 2016).
· cites it 3× “§ 2-108(D), the case was ordered to proceed as though Nichols had been the initial appellant.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-108(A) — 1 case
State v. Schnell, 757 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
“See § 2-108(A). Thus, the Supreme Court has long held that as a general rule, an appellant may dismiss his or her appeal without the consent of the appellee.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-108(B) — 1 case
State v. Schnell, 757 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
“See § 2-108(A). Thus, the Supreme Court has long held that as a general rule, an appellant may dismiss his or her appeal without the consent of the appellee.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-108(C) — 1 case
State v. Schnell, 757 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
“See § 2-108(A). Thus, the Supreme Court has long held that as a general rule, an appellant may dismiss his or her appeal without the consent of the appellee.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-108(D) — 2 cases
Nichols v. Fairway Bldg. Prods., 884 N.W.2d 124 (Neb. 2016).
“§ 2-108(D), the case was ordered to proceed as though Nichols had been the initial appellant.”
State v. Schnell, 757 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
“See § 2-108(A). Thus, the Supreme Court has long held that as a general rule, an appellant may dismiss his or her appeal without the consent of the appellee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.