Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-2006 (2026)

County officers; removal by judicial proceedings; defensive pleadings

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No answer or other pleading after the complaint is necessary, but the defendant may move to reject the complaint upon any ground rendering such motion proper; and he may answer if he desires, and if he answers the accuser may reply or not. But if there be an answer and reply, the provisions of section 23-2003 relating to pleadings in the action shall apply.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–1997 · leading case: Hynes v. Hogan, 558 N.W.2d 35 (Neb. 1997).
Hynes v. Hogan, 558 N.W.2d 35 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 2× “” Section 23-2006 provides: No answer or other pleading after the complaint is necessary, but the defendant may move to reject the complaint *408 upon any ground rendering such motion proper; and he may answer if he desires, and if he answers the accuser may reply or not.”
Hynes v. Hogan, 553 N.W.2d 162 (Neb. Ct. App. 1996). “” We therefore construe Hogan’s demurrer as a proper pleading in this matter and treat it as we would any demurrer under our rules of civil procedure.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.