Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (2026)

Decision; review by Supreme Court

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Within thirty days after the Court of Appeals has issued its decision in a case, any party to the case may petition the Supreme Court for further review of the decision in the manner prescribed by the rules of the Supreme Court.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: State v. Childs, 495 N.W.2d 475 (Neb. 1993).
State v. Childs, 495 N.W.2d 475 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum. Supp. 1992), this court has accepted the petition of Steven W.”
State v. Schrein, 504 N.W.2d 827 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 4× “The State petitioned for, and this court has granted, further review pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum.Supp.1992). We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.”
State v. Neujahr, 540 N.W.2d 566 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 2× “We have granted the State’s petition' for further review pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum. Supp. 1994).”
State v. Riley, 497 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “The State of Nebraska has petitioned this Court under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum. Supp. 1992) for further review of the decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals which is reported in 1 NCA 629 (1992).”
Backhaus v. Backhaus, 20 N.W.3d 81 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “STANDARD OF REVIEW [1] In an action for the dissolution of marriage, an appellate court reviews de novo on the record the trial court’s determinations of custody, child support, property division, alimony, and attorney fees; these determinations, however, are initially entrusted…”
Corcoran v. Lovercheck, 594 N.W.2d 615 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “The statutory basis for our review of judgments of the Court of Appeals is Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Reissue 1995), which provides: “Within thirty days after the Court of Appeals has *943 issued its decision in a case, any party to the case may petition the Supreme Court for…”
State v. Reimers, 496 N.W.2d 518 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum. Supp. 1992), this court has granted Ronald E.”
State v. Jeremiah T., 21 N.W.3d 313 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Reissue 2016). - 136 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 319 Nebraska Reports STATE V.”
State v. Reynolds, 496 N.W.2d 872 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “This case comes before us on the State’s petition for further review, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum. Supp. 1992), of a decision of the Court of Appeals reported at 1 NCA 1429 (1992).”
Aken v. Nebraska Methodist Hosp., 511 N.W.2d 762 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “Methodist timely filed a petition for further review of the order of the Court of Appeals, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum. Supp. 1992).”
W. Fertilizer & Cordage Co. v. City of All., 504 N.W.2d 808 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 3× “Western petitioned for further review pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum. Supp. 1992).”
State v. Covarrubias, 507 N.W.2d 248 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “The State petitioned for, and this court granted, further review pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1107 (Cum. Supp. 1992).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.