Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 24
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

24-541.06.

Transferred to section 25-2733.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48 cases, 1982–2018 · leading case: State v. Thalken, 299 Neb. 857 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Thalken, 299 Neb. 857 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (1) (Cum. Supp.”
In Re Est. of Sehi, 772 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “" Neb. Rev.Stat. § 24-541.06(1) (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Thompson, 402 N.W.2d 271 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 4× “Since the district court was acting as a reviewing rather than as a sentencing court, the State had the right to cross-appeal from that erroneous ruling. However, it elected not to do so, and we therefore do not disturb the district court's reduction of the jail time imposed by…”
Mason v. Schumacher, 439 N.W.2d 61 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 4× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (Reissue 1985), Mason appealed to the district court, which, after finding that Mason had not abandoned the leased premises, held that (1) the county court’s dismissal of Mason’s conversion action was erroneous; (2) Mason was entitled to…”
In Re Est. of Odineal, 368 N.W.2d 800 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “(3) County Judge Philip Riley refused to disqualify himself, although he had done so at a prior hearing in the estate.”
Firmature v. Brannon, 388 N.W.2d 119 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 8× “KRIVOSHA, Chief Justice, concurring in the result.”
State v. Lynch, 394 N.W.2d 651 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 2× “2d 862 (1984); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (1) (Reissue 1985).”
Collection Bureau of Lincoln v. Loos, 443 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 6× “There, we found that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (Cum. Supp. 1982) provided that, with certain exceptions not material here, the district court reviews appeals from the county court for error appearing on the record made in the county court.”
State v. Schall, 449 N.W.2d 225 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (Cum. Supp. 1984).”
State v. Moore, 411 N.W.2d 345 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (1) [Reissue 1985]----The district court in the instant case was functioning as an appellate court and not as a trial court; thus, it was restricted in its review to the record made in the lower court.”
Rorick P'ship v. Haug, 422 N.W.2d 365 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (1) (Reissue 1985).”
Holden v. Urban, 398 N.W.2d 699 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (Reissue 1985).”
Show all 48 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06(1) — 4 cases
State v. Thalken, 299 Neb. 857 (Neb. 2018). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (1) (Cum. Supp.”
In Re Est. of Sehi, 772 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). “" Neb. Rev.Stat. § 24-541.06(1) (Cum. Supp.”
Collection Bureau of Lincoln v. Loos, 443 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 1989). “There, we found that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (Cum. Supp. 1982) provided that, with certain exceptions not material here, the district court reviews appeals from the county court for error appearing on the record made in the county court.”
State v. Thalken, 299 Neb. 857 (Neb. 2018).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06(2) — 2 cases
State v. Turner, 355 N.W.2d 219 (Neb. 1984).
Collection Bureau of Lincoln v. Loos, 443 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 1989). “There, we found that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (Cum. Supp. 1982) provided that, with certain exceptions not material here, the district court reviews appeals from the county court for error appearing on the record made in the county court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.