Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 24
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-568 (2026)

Transferred to section 25-21,219

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

24-568.

Transferred to section 25-21,219.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1982–2020 · leading case: Stuthman v. Stuthman, 515 N.W.2d 781 (Neb. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stuthman v. Stuthman, 515 N.W.2d 781 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 6× “293 stated that one of its purposes was “to amend section 24-568,” which later became § 25-21,219.”
TDP Phase One v. The Club at the Yard, 307 Neb. 795 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “23 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-568 (Reissue 1985). - 806 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 307 Nebraska Reports TDP PHASE ONE v.”
Caeli Assocs., Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 415 N.W.2d 116 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “However, as Firestone has not complained of the remedy sought by Caeli, we elect in this instance to review the issues presented by Caeli’s assignments of error, which are that the trial judge erred in finding that Firestone did not breach the lease by (1) defeating the…”
Newman v. Hinky Dinky Omaha-Lincoln, Inc., 427 N.W.2d 50 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 24-568 et seq. (Reissue 1985) (forcible entry and detainer).”
Hogan v. Pelton, 315 N.W.2d 644 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-568 (Reissue 1979) gives the county and municipal courts jurisdiction “over complaints of unlawful and forcible entry into lands and tenements and the detention of the same, and of complaints against those who, having a lawful and peaceable entry into lands…”
Rorick P'ship v. Haug, 422 N.W.2d 365 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “§ 76-1447 (Reissue 1986) of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 24-568 (Reissue 1985) and 76-1401 to 76-1449 (Reissue 1986), provides: If either party feels aggrieved by the judgment, he may appeal as in other civil actions.”
Otto v. Hongsermeier Farms, Inc., 348 N.W.2d 422 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 2× “Actions in forcible entry and detainer in the county and municipal courts are controlled by Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 24-568 et seq. (Reissue 1979).”
Brennan v. Brennan, 332 N.W.2d 696 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 2× “Although this particular case is brought pursuant to the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, the procedures set forth in the statutes are essentially the same as the procedures found at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-568 (Reissue 1979) on forcible entry and detainer of…”
Watson v. Arcadian Foods, Inc., 447 N.W.2d 477 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “Watson’s action was a summary proceeding under Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 24-568 et seq. (Reissue 1985), wherein a determination is made as to the right to possession of real estate and the method by which that possession may be restored.”
Carroll v. Holthus, 447 N.W.2d 22 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-568 (Reissue 1985). The matter of compelling repair or of damages sustained must be left to a different day and, dependent on the relief prayed for, a different forum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.