Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-723 (2026)

Supreme Court; record of proceedings; review; order; retirement, removal, or suspension; effect

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Supreme Court shall review the record of the proceedings and in its discretion may permit the introduction of additional evidence. The Supreme Court shall make such determination as it finds just and proper, and may order the reprimand, discipline, censure, suspension without pay for a definite period of time not to exceed six months, removal, or retirement of such Justice or judge of the Supreme Court or other judge, or may wholly reject the recommendation. Upon an order for retirement, the Justice or judge of the Supreme Court or other judge shall thereby be retired with the same rights and privileges as if he or she had retired pursuant to statute. Upon an order for removal, the Justice or judge of the Supreme Court or other judge shall be removed from office, his or her salary shall cease from the date of such order, and he or she shall be ineligible for judicial office. Upon an order for suspension, the Justice or judge of the Supreme Court or other judge shall draw no salary and shall perform no judicial functions during the period of suspension. Suspension shall not create a vacancy in the office of Justice or judge of the Supreme Court or other judge.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases, 1984–2009 · leading case: In Re Kneifl, 351 N.W.2d 693 (Neb. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Kneifl, 351 N.W.2d 693 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 4× “Section 24-723 reiterates the same powers, although in slightly altered language.”

In Re Complaint Against White, 651 N.W.2d 551 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 2× “V, § 30(2); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 24-723 (Reissue 1995); Neb.”

In Re Kelly, 407 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “or (6) conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute.”

In Re Empson, 562 N.W.2d 817 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 2× “The commission, in adopting the findings of the master, recommended that respondent be suspended from his judicial office for a period of 6 months without pay.”

State ex rel. Comm'n on Jud. Qualifications v. Lindner, 710 N.W.2d 866 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 2× “V, § 30(2); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-723 (Reissue 1995); Neb.”

In Re Complaint Against Lindner, 271 Neb. 323 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 2× “V, § 30(2); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-723 (Reissue 1995); Neb.”

Staley Ex Rel. Comm'n on Jud. Qualifications v. Staley, 486 N.W.2d 886 (Neb. 1992). “V, § 30(2), and § 24-723. See, also, Neb. Const, art. V, § 1, vesting in this court general administrative authority over all courts.”

State ex rel. Comm'n on Jud. Qualifications v. Kneifl, 351 N.W.2d 693 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 4× “Section 24-723 reiterates the same powers, although in slightly altered language.”

State ex rel. Comm'n on Jud. Qualifications v. White, 651 N.W.2d 551 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 2× “V, § 30(2); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-723 (Reissue 1995); Neb.”

In Re Marcuzzo, 770 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “V, § 30(2); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 24-723 (Reissue 2008); Neb.”

State ex rel. Comm'n on Jud. Qualifications v. Kelly, 407 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “or (6) conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute---- We received no additional evidence; hence, our scope of review is de novo on the record.”

State ex rel. Comm'n on Jud. Qualifications v. Empson, 562 N.W.2d 817 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 2× “The commission, in adopting the findings of the master, recommended that respondent be suspended from his judicial office for a period of 6 months without pay.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.