Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1031.01 (2026)

Garnishment; judgment; effect

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The judgment in the garnishment action shall be conclusive between the garnishee, plaintiff, defendant, and any intervenor.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2022 · leading case: Florence Lake Investments v. Berg, 978 N.W.2d 308 (Neb. 2022).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Florence Lake Investments v. Berg, 978 N.W.2d 308 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “02 (Reissue 2016) (“trial of the determination of the liability of the garnishee shall be conducted the same as in a civil action,” and if garnishee is found liable, “[t]he plaintiff in such event may have a judgment against the garnishee”); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1031 (Reissue…”

Bank of Mead v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 275 N.W.2d 822 (Neb. 1979). “Our specific holding that the Bank of Mead did not suffer a loss within the coverage of these bonds is res judicata, and may not again be litigated. “The judgment in the garnishment action will be *406 conclusive between the garnishee, plaintiff, defendant, and any intervener.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.