Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1062 (2026)

Injunction, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The injunction provided by this code is a command to refrain from a particular act. It may be the final judgment in an action or may be allowed as a provisional remedy, subject to the provisions of sections 25-1062 to 25-1080, and when so allowed it shall be by order. The writ of injunction is abolished.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: Waste Connections of Nebraska, Inc. v. City of Lincoln, 697 N.W.2d 256 (Neb. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Waste Connections of Nebraska, Inc. v. City of Lincoln, 697 N.W.2d 256 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “2004) and a temporary and permanent injunction pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1062 et seq. (Reissue 1995 & Cum.”
Rigel Corp. v. Cutchall, 511 N.W.2d 519 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “2d 200 (1993), and injunctions, which are provided for by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1062 et seq. (Reissue 1989), but are invariably reviewed as equitable actions.”
Stewart v. Advanced Gaming Tech., Inc., 723 N.W.2d 65 (Neb. 2006). “2004) (Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act), §§ 25-1062 to 25-1080 (Reissue 1995 & Cum.”
State v. Wells, 598 N.W.2d 30 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “Confronted with this situation, Wells had several unexercised lawful civil courses of potential resolution available, including, as the trial court observed, an action seeking as relief a temporary restraining order and injunction, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1062 *340 et seq.…”
O'CONNOR v. Kaufman, 574 N.W.2d 513 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1062 (Reissue 1995) states: “The injunction provided by this code is a command to refrain from a particular act.”
City of Hastings v. Sheets, 317 Neb. 88 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 2× “26 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1062 to 25-1080 (Reissue 2016) and 25-1902 (Cum.”
Buda ex rel. Buda v. Humble, 517 N.W.2d 622 (Neb. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1062 (Reissue 1989).”
Buda on Behalf of Buda v. Humble, 517 N.W.2d 622 (Neb. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1062 (Reissue 1989). The order in this case commands Humble to refrain from doing certain things, and it is an injunction.”
Boppre v. Franks (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). “f consists in restraining the commission or continuance of some act, the commission or continuance of which during the litigation would produce great or irreparable injury to the plaintiff, or when, during the litigation, it appears that the defendant is doing, or threatens, or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.