Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1067 (2026)

Injunctions; security

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No injunction, unless provided by special statute, shall operate until the party obtaining the same shall give an undertaking, executed by one or more sufficient sureties, who shall justify as provided in sections 25-2222 and 25-2223. The undertaking shall be approved by the clerk of the court granting such injunction, in an amount to be fixed by the court or judge allowing the same, to secure to the party enjoined the damages he may sustain, if it be finally decided that the injunction ought not to have been granted.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1979–2009 · leading case: Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squier, 472 N.W.2d 391 (Neb. 1991).
Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squier, 472 N.W.2d 391 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “Consequently, after our de novo review of the record, we independently reach the same conclusion reached by the district court, namely, injunctive relief is appropriate under the circumstances. For that reason, we affirm the district court’s judgments for injunctive relief.”
State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Ledwith, 281 N.W.2d 729 (Neb. 1979). “§ 25-1067, R. R. S. 1943. As in the case in all jurisdictions which we have examined, the party enjoined may recover damages on the bond only “if it be finally decided that the injunction ought not to have been granted.”
Lewis Serv. Ctr., Inc. v. Mack Fin. Corp., an Ohio Corp., 696 F.2d 66 (8th Cir. 1982). “We find it unnecessary and therefore decline, in the absence of a state court decision, to construe the temporary order provision as requiring a bond pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1067 which imposes a bond requirement before the issuance of an injunction “unless provided by…”
Koch v. Aupperle, 763 N.W.2d 415 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 5× “Koch was required to post a bond under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1067 (Reissue 2008). The district court set the bond at $1,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.