Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1151 (2026)
Transferred to section 25-21,185
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
25-1151.
Transferred to section 25-21,185.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 62
cases, 1945–2006 · leading case: Shipler v. Gen. Motors Corp., 710 N.W.2d 807 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006).
Shipler v. Gen. Motors Corp., 710 N.W.2d 807 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1151 (Reissue 1975).”
C. C. Natvig's Sons, Inc. v. Summers, 255 N.W.2d 272 (Neb. 1977). “Section 25-1151, R.R.S.1943, provides: "In all actions brought to recover damages for injuries to a person or to his property caused by the negligence of another, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery when the…”
Gustafson v. Benda, 661 S.W.2d 11 (Mo. 1983). “§§ 27-1-702, -703 (1981); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1151 (1979); Nev.Rev.Stat.”
Hilen v. Hays, 673 S.W.2d 713 (Ky. 1984). “(15) Nebraska, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1151 (1979). (16) Nevada, Nev.”
Petznick v. United States, 575 F. Supp. 698 (D. Neb. 1983). “§ 25-1151 (1979). Causation The Court finds that the defendant’s failure to de-energize its high voltage transmission lines operated as the primary moving cause of plaintiff’s injury.”
Lippard v. Houdaille Indus., Inc., 715 S.W.2d 491 (Mo. 1986). “See Comment, Abrogation of Joint and Several Liability: Should Missouri Be Next in Line?, 52 U.K.C.L.R. 72 (1983). [22] California Primary Election June 17, 1986.”
Nickell v. Russell, 525 N.W.2d 203 (Neb. 1995). “1961) (citing Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1151 (Reissue 1956)). Thus, the district court erred in granting a directed verdict dismissing Russell's claim of contributory negligence.”
Vrba v. Kelly, 255 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. 1977). “See section 25-1151, R.R.S.1943, the comparative negligence statute in Nebraska.”
Bashus v. Turner, 352 N.W.2d 161 (Neb. 1984). “Next, Bashus contends that the trial court erred in instructing on comparative negligence, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1151 (Reissue 1979), claiming that Turner did not specifically plead that Bashus' slight negligence was sufficient to reduce or mitigate damages.”
Brackman Ex Rel. Schaub v. Brackman, 100 N.W.2d 774 (Neb. 1960). “13; that the definitions as given in said instruction related to section 39-740, R. R. S. 1943, known as the automobile guest passenger statute; and that said definitions are not to be considered in the same light with reference to the comparative negligence statute, section…”
Niemeyer v. Est. of Tichota, 212 N.W.2d 557 (Neb. 1973). “Section 25-1151, R.R.S.1943, provides: "In all actions brought to recover damages for injuries to a person or to his property caused by the negligence of another, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery when the…”
Kirchner v. Gast, 100 N.W.2d 65 (Neb. 1959). “Defendant denying negligence alleged negligence and contributory negligence of plaintiff in the following particulars as the proximate cause of the damages claimed: (1) In driving at an excessive and unlawful speed; (2) in failing to have his automobile under control; (3) in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.