Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1636 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

25-1636.

Transferred to section 25-1652.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1987–1996 · leading case: State v. Boppre, 453 N.W.2d 406 (Neb. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Boppre, 453 N.W.2d 406 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 2× “Indeed, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1636 (Reissue 1989) specifically provides that it shall not be a cause of challenge that a juror has read in the newspapers an account of the commission of a crime with which a prisoner is charged, if such juror shall state on oath that it is the…”
State v. Jacobs, 410 N.W.2d 468 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “§ 25-1636 (Reissue 1985) specifically provides that it shall not be a cause of challenge that a juror has read in the newspapers an account of the commission of a crime with which a prisoner is charged, if such juror shall state on oath that it is the belief of said person that…”
State v. Phelps, 490 N.W.2d 676 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 2× “§ 25-1636 (Reissue 1989) provides that [i]t shall not be a cause of challenge that a juror has read in the newspapers an account of the commission of a crime with which a prisoner is charged, if such juror shall state on oath that it is the belief of said person that he or she…”
State v. Bird Head, 408 N.W.2d 309 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “§ 25-1636 (Reissue 1985) which reads: It shall not be a cause of challenge that a juror has read in the newspapers an account of the commission of a crime with which a prisoner is charged, if such juror shall state on oath that it is the belief of said person that he or she can…”
Kusek v. Burlington N. R.R., 552 N.W.2d 778 (Neb. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1636 (Reissue 1995) provides in part: “It shall be ground for challenge for cause that any proposed juror lacks any of the qualifications provided by law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.