Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (2026)
Actions not specified
✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
An action for relief not otherwise provided for in Chapter 25 can only be brought within four years after the cause of action shall have accrued.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1958–2025 · leading case: Lindner v. Kindig, 881 N.W.2d 579 (Neb. 2016).
Lindner v. Kindig, 881 N.W.2d 579 (Neb. 2016). “661 On June 15, 2015, the district court filed an order in which it determined that the 4-year catchall limitations period set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Cum. Supp. 2014) applied and that Lindner’s action accrued more than 4 years before he filed his complaint.”
Adkins v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R., 615 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 2000). “The sole issue on appeal is whether § 48-1118(2) or Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 1995) provides the applicable statute of limitations for FEPA claims brought pursuant to Neb.”
Wendeln v. Beatrice Manor, Inc., 712 N.W.2d 226 (Neb. 2006). “We ultimately rejected the plaintiff’s argument that since § 20-148 contained no statute of limitations, his claim was governed by the 4-year catchall limitations period set forth in Neb.”
Trausch v. Hagemeier, 985 N.W.2d 402 (Neb. 2023). “(a) Claim Against Hagemeier as an Individual The Trausches contend that the claim against Hagemeier for negligence with respect to her duties as a notary is an action on an official bond, and therefore benefits from the 10-year statute of limitations period found in § 25-209.”
Monahan v. State of Neb., 491 F. Supp. 1074 (D. Neb. 1980). “See Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 25-212, 25-219. Under either of these statutes, Rose’s claim would have been timely brought.”
Lake v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Inc., 365 N.W.2d 838 (Neb. 1985). “We believe the statute of limitations applicable in this case is the general statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 1979), which bars actions “not hereinbefore provided for” that have not been commenced within 4 years.”
MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co., 343 N.W.2d 58 (Neb. 1984). “At the date of Amy’s injury Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 1975) specified a 4-year statute of limitations for a claim based on product liability, viz, such action “can only be brought within four years after the cause of action shall have accrued.”
Mangan v. Landen, 365 N.W.2d 453 (Neb. 1985). “§ 25-207 (Reissue 1979) or more appropriately falls within the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 1979) for the reason that it is an action not otherwise specified, it is clear that, absent some reason to toll the statute of limitations, any action relying on a…”
City of Lincoln, Neb. v. Windstream Nebraska, Inc., 800 F. Supp. 2d 1030 (D. Neb. 2011). “” 4 Section 25-212 5 provides: “An action for relief not hereinbefore provided for can only be brought within four years after the cause of action shall have accrued.”
Lewis v. Hiskey, 89 N.W.2d 132 (Neb. 1958). “The statute relied upon was section 25-212, R. R. S. 1943. Some 12 interrogatories submitted by plaintiff were served upon defendant, who answered in part as hereinafter indicated.”
Jones v. Johnson, 300 N.W.2d 816 (Neb. 1981). “The principal issue upon the appeal is whether the complaint, on its face, shows that any recovery by the trustee against the executrix is barred by the statute of limitations.”
Epp v. Gunter, 677 F. Supp. 1415 (D. Neb. 1988). “§ 25-212. As this recitation of statutes demonstrates, there is no distinction between intentional and unintentional torts that controls the categorization of torts in Nebraska for statutes of limitation purposes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.