Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (2026)

Actions not specified

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An action for relief not otherwise provided for in Chapter 25 can only be brought within four years after the cause of action shall have accrued.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1958–2025 · leading case: Lindner v. Kindig, 881 N.W.2d 579 (Neb. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lindner v. Kindig, 881 N.W.2d 579 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 14× “661 On June 15, 2015, the district court filed an order in which it determined that the 4-year catchall limitations period set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Cum. Supp. 2014) applied and that Lindner’s action accrued more than 4 years before he filed his complaint.”
Adkins v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R., 615 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 13× “The sole issue on appeal is whether § 48-1118(2) or Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 1995) provides the applicable statute of limitations for FEPA claims brought pursuant to Neb.”
Wendeln v. the Beatrice Manor, Inc., 712 N.W.2d 226 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 2× “We ultimately rejected the plaintiff’s argument that since § 20-148 contained no statute of limitations, his claim was governed by the 4-year catchall limitations period set forth in Neb.”
Trausch v. Hagemeier, 313 Neb. 538 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 25-205 (1) (Reissue 2016) (action upon promise in writing), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 2016) (action not provided for in chapter 25), Neb.”
Monahan v. State of Neb., 491 F. Supp. 1074 (D. Neb. 1980). · cites it 2× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 25-212, 25-219. Under either of these statutes, Rose’s claim would have been timely brought.”
Lake v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Inc., 365 N.W.2d 838 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 3× “We believe the statute of limitations applicable in this case is the general statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 1979), which bars actions “not hereinbefore provided for” that have not been commenced within 4 years.”
MacKu by & Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co., 343 N.W.2d 58 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 2× “At the date of Amy’s injury Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 1975) specified a 4-year statute of limitations for a claim based on product liability, viz, such action “can only be brought within four years after the cause of action shall have accrued.”
Mangan v. Landen, 365 N.W.2d 453 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “§ 25-207 (Reissue 1979) or more appropriately falls within the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 1979) for the reason that it is an action not otherwise specified, it is clear that, absent some reason to toll the statute of limitations, any action relying on a…”
City of Lincoln, Neb. v. Windstream Nebraska, Inc., 800 F. Supp. 2d 1030 (D. Neb. 2011). · cites it 5× “” 4 Section 25-212 5 provides: “An action for relief not hereinbefore provided for can only be brought within four years after the cause of action shall have accrued.”
Lewis v. Hiskey, 89 N.W.2d 132 (Neb. 1958). · cites it 2× “The statute relied upon was section 25-212, R. R. S. 1943. Some 12 interrogatories submitted by plaintiff were served upon defendant, who answered in part as hereinafter indicated.”
In re Est. of Filsinger, 29 Neb. Ct. App. 809 (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “The Claimants argue that the general 4-year statute of limitations for actions not otherwise specified found in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212 (Reissue 2016) should apply.”
Jones v. Johnson, 300 N.W.2d 816 (Neb. 1981). “The principal issue upon the appeal is whether the complaint, on its face, shows that any recovery by the trustee against the executrix is barred by the statute of limitations.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.