Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2602.02 (2026)

Contract; statement required

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following statement shall appear in capitalized, underlined type adjoining the signature block of any standardized agreement in which binding arbitration is the sole remedy for dispute resolution: THIS CONTRACT CONTAINS AN ARBITRATION PROVISION WHICH MAY BE ENFORCED BY THE PARTIES.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2023 · leading case: Aramark Unif. & Career Apparel, Inc. v. Hunan, Inc., 757 N.W.2d 205 (Neb. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Aramark Unif. & Career Apparel, Inc. v. Hunan, Inc., 757 N.W.2d 205 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 9× “Specifically, Hunan *208 claimed that the arbitration provision was invalid because it failed to contain language required by § 25-2602.02, which provides: "The following statement shall appear in capitalized, underlined type adjoining the signature block of any standardized…”
Garlock v. 3DS Props., L. L.C., 303 Neb. 521 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 5× “In support, the Garlocks alleged for the first time that the arbitration provision in the purchase **525 agreement violated Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2602.02 (Reissue 2016) of Nebraska's Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA) 2 because certain language was not underlined.”
Kramer v. Eagle Eye Home Inspections, Inc., 716 N.W.2d 749 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 7× “(ii) Violation of Nebraska Statutory Law Section 25-2602.02 states, “The following statement shall appear in capitalized, underlined type adjoining the signature block of any standardized agreement in which binding arbitration is the sole remedy for dispute resolution: THIS…”
Hollins v. Debt Relief of Am., 479 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (D. Neb. 2007). · cites it 3× “” Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-2602.02 (2006). Hollins maintains that § 25-2602.”
Affiliated Foods Midwest Coop., Inc. v. Integrated Distrib. Solutions, LLC, 460 F. Supp. 2d 1068 (D. Neb. 2006). · cites it 9× “02 states: The following statement shall appear in capitalized, underlined type adjoining the signature block of any standardized agreement in which binding arbitration is the sole remedy for dispute resolution: THIS CONTRACT CONTAINS AN ARBITRATION PROVISION WHICH MAY BE…”
Garlock v. 3DS Props., 303 Neb. 521 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 5× “In response, 3DS and Donner filed another motion to dismiss, again asserting that the purchase agreement required the parties’ dispute to be settled by binding arbitration.”
McPherson v. Walgreens Boot All., 993 N.W.2d 679 (Neb. 2023). “2 Patera argued that under the UAA, the arbitration provision was unenforce- able for the following reasons: (1) specific notice language required by § 25-2602.02 was not included, (2) claims “arising out of personal injury based on tort” are not subject to arbi- tration under §…”
David Fiala, Ltd. v. Harrison (Neb. 2015). · cites it 4× “§ 25-2602.02. The Nebraska statute provides the exact wording for this notice requirement and requires that this statement be capitalized and underlined.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.