(a) Upon application made within ninety days after delivery of a copy of the award to the applicant, the court shall modify or correct the award when:
(1) There was an evident miscalculation of figures or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property referred to in the award;
(2) The arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them and the award may be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision upon the issues submitted; or
(3) The award is imperfect in a matter of form, not affecting the merits of the controversy.
(b) If the application is granted, the court shall modify and correct the award so as to effect its intent and shall confirm the award as so modified and corrected. Otherwise, the court shall confirm the award as made.
(c) An application to modify or correct an award may be joined in the alternative with an application to vacate the award.
Notes of Decisions
Jones v. Summit Ltd. P'ship Five, 635 N.W.2d 267 (Neb. 2001).
· cites it 12× “After the dispute was submitted to arbitration, The Summit Group requested that the district court modify or correct the arbitrator’s award pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2614 (a)(l) (Reissue 1995).”
Hartman v. City of Grand Island, 657 N.W.2d 641 (Neb. 2003).
· cites it 2× “” As noted, in this case, the city did not file an application to modify or correct the award pursuant to § 25-2614, nor did it file an application to vacate the award pursuant to § 25-2613.”
Garlock v. 3DS Props., L. L.C., 930 N.W.2d 503 (Neb. 2019).
“Instead, the district court should have confirmed the arbitration award pursuant to § 25-2612 and then entered judgment in conformity therewith pursuant to § 25-2615.”
State v. Nebraska Assn. of Pub. Employees, 984 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. 2023).
“Although the parties may have contracted for a decision that included findings of fact and conclusions of law, it cannot be said that the arbitrator exceeded his powers or materially erred by failing to include sufficient detail in his accompanying decision. The award reflects…”
MBNA Am. Bank, NA v. Hansen, 745 N.W.2d 609 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
“Section 25-2615 states that "[u]pon the granting of an order confirming, modifying, or correcting an award, a judgment or decree shall be entered in conformity therewith and should be enforced as any other judgment or decree.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2614(a): 2 cases
Hartman v. City of Grand Island, 657 N.W.2d 641 (Neb. 2003).
“” As noted, in this case, the city did not file an application to modify or correct the award pursuant to § 25-2614, nor did it file an application to vacate the award pursuant to § 25-2613.”
State v. Nebraska Assn. of Pub. Employees, 984 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. 2023).
“Although the parties may have contracted for a decision that included findings of fact and conclusions of law, it cannot be said that the arbitrator exceeded his powers or materially erred by failing to include sufficient detail in his accompanying decision. The award reflects…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2614(a)(1): 1 case
Jones v. Summit Ltd. P'ship Five, 635 N.W.2d 267 (Neb. 2001).
“After the dispute was submitted to arbitration, The Summit Group requested that the district court modify or correct the arbitrator’s award pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2614 (a)(l) (Reissue 1995).”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2614(a)(l): 1 case
Jones v. Summit Ltd. P'ship Five, 635 N.W.2d 267 (Neb. 2001).
“After the dispute was submitted to arbitration, The Summit Group requested that the district court modify or correct the arbitrator’s award pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2614 (a)(l) (Reissue 1995).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.