Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-311 (2026)

Joinder of plaintiffs

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative in respect of or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences and if any question of law or fact common to all these persons will arise in the action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Eicher v. Mid Am. Fin. Inv. Corp., 702 N.W.2d 792 (Neb. 2005).
Eicher v. Mid Am. Fin. Inv. Corp., 702 N.W.2d 792 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 3× “The relevant joinder statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-311 (Cum. Supp. 2004), provides: All persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative in respect of or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or…”
Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp., 631 N.W.2d 846 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 3× “) Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-311 (Cum. Supp. 2000).”
Bailey v. Lund-Ross Constructors Co., 657 N.W.2d 916 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “Federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction of appeals from “final decisions” of federal district courts, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and “Rule 54(b) does not and cannot relax in any way the statutory requirement of finality .”
Goeke v. Nat'l Farms, Inc., 512 N.W.2d 626 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 3× “The court directed the appellants either to cease operating their facility or to take prompt and reasonable steps to abate the odors.”
Mann v. Mann, 978 N.W.2d 606 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “2d 531 (1997), overruled on other grounds, Hornig v.”
TDP Phase One v. Club at the Yard, 950 N.W.2d 640 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “” 20 At that time, FED actions originated in municipal courts and “by this court” referred to municipal courts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.