Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-311 (2026)

Joinder of plaintiffs

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative in respect of or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences and if any question of law or fact common to all these persons will arise in the action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Eicher v. Mid Am. Fin. Inv. Corp., 702 N.W.2d 792 (Neb. 2005).
Eicher v. Mid Am. Fin. Inv. Corp., 702 N.W.2d 792 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 3× “The relevant joinder statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-311 (Cum. Supp. 2004), provides: All persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative in respect of or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or…”
Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp., 631 N.W.2d 846 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 3× “) Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-311 (Cum. Supp. 2000).”
Bailey v. Lund-Ross Constructors Co., 657 N.W.2d 916 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “Federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction of appeals from “final decisions” of federal district courts, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and “Rule 54(b) does not and cannot relax in any way the statutory requirement of finality .”
Goeke v. Nat'l Farms, Inc., 512 N.W.2d 626 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 3× “The court directed the appellants either to cease operating their facility or to take prompt and reasonable steps to abate the odors.”
Mann v. Mann, 978 N.W.2d 606 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “22 Uncertainty in applying these rules in multiclaim, multiparty cases prompted some parties to file premature appeals, and others to miss appeal deadlines altogether.”
TDP Phase One v. The Club at the Yard, 307 Neb. 795 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-311 , 25-320, 25-701, and 25-705 (Reissue 2016); Introducer’s Statement of Intent, L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.