Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 (2026)

Service on corporation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A corporation may be served by personal, residence, certified mail, or designated delivery service upon any officer, director, managing agent, or registered agent, or by leaving the process at the corporation's registered office with a person employed therein, or by certified mail or designated delivery service to the corporation's registered office.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (30 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: Candyland, LLC v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm., 306 Neb. 169 (Neb. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Candyland, LLC v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm., 306 Neb. 169 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “It provided the flexibility to allow a corporation to be served as a corporation, [ Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 (Reissue 2016),] an individual to be served as an indi- vidual, [§ 25-508.”
Gen. Serv. Bureau, Inc. v. Moller, 672 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “West also suggests that service of notice of the hearing should have been performed pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 (Reissue 1995), pertaining to service of process on corporations.”
Perkins Cty. Bd. of Equal. v. Mid Am. Agri Prods., 317 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 3× “26 Here, because Wheatland is a corporation, the manner of serving summons in a civil action is governed by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 (Reissue 2016).”
Webb v. Franken (D. Neb. 2022). · cites it 4× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 . d. The Marshals Service shall serve Defendant Lincoln Journal Star by certified mail at Lee Enterprises Inc.”
Hood-Bey v. Brown (D. Neb. 2025). · cites it 4× “Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 , Hood-Bey was permitted to serve these defendants by certified mail “upon any officer, director, managing agent, or registered agent” or by certified mail “to the corporation’s registered office.”
Akins v. Al-Aboudy (Neb. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “It further found that “A & B Auto LLC was never made a party to the action or served pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-509.01 .” It therefore determined that the small claims court erred when it entered a judgment against A&B.”
Peniska v. Cj Foods Inc. (D. Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 . 4. The United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Plaintiff.”
Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. Superior Heating & Cooling, LLC (D. Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “On March 29, 2019, the original summons issued for Greene was returned unexecuted after five unsuccessful 1 The Court notes that under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 , Plaintiff appears to have properly served Superior Heating & Cooling, LLC.”
FocusOne Solutions, LLC v. Complete Bus. Solutions Grp., Inc. (D. Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “4(h)(1)(A) and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 (Reissue 2016).”
FocusOne Solutions, LLC v. Complete Bus. Solutions Grp., Inc. (D. Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “FocusOne served CBSG with summons via certified mail to its registered office as permitted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1)(A) and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 (Reissue 2016).”
Goodwin v. Hughes (D. Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 . 11. The clerk of the court is directed to obtain the last known address for Dr.”
Closser v. P.C.C.W. Teleservices (US) Inc. (D. Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-509.01 . 4. The United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Plaintiff.”
Show all 37 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.